E-Commerce Website QA & UX Audit
Budget: $30 – $250 CAD
I’m preparing to launch a new e-commerce site and need a fresh, methodical set of eyes to make sure everything works flawlessly and feels intuitive before we go live. The job is a full-scale quality-assurance sweep combined with a usability audit and clear bug reporting.
Scope
The store must run perfectly on desktop, mobile, and tablet. I’m particularly concerned with three pillars during testing:
• Functionality – every link, button, form, cart action, payment flow, signup, and email trigger.
• Performance – load times, asset optimisation, responsive behaviour, and any rendering glitches.
• Security – obvious vulnerabilities, mixed-content warnings, insecure cookies, or anything that could jeopardise customer data.
Deliverables
1. A prioritised bug list (critical, major, minor) with steps to reproduce, device/browser details, and screenshots or short Loom videos.
2. A concise UX critique highlighting friction points and quick-win improvements.
3. A performance snapshot (e.g., Lighthouse report) with recommendations.
4. Final re-test confirmation once fixes are applied.
Acceptance criteria: every critical and major issue identified, reproducible instructions provided, and no blocker bugs left after re-test.
If you’re meticulous with QA tools (BrowserStack, Chrome DevTools, OWASP ZAP, Lighthouse) and have a keen eye for user experience, I’d love your help to launch with confidence.
Scope
The store must run perfectly on desktop, mobile, and tablet. I’m particularly concerned with three pillars during testing:
• Functionality – every link, button, form, cart action, payment flow, signup, and email trigger.
• Performance – load times, asset optimisation, responsive behaviour, and any rendering glitches.
• Security – obvious vulnerabilities, mixed-content warnings, insecure cookies, or anything that could jeopardise customer data.
Deliverables
1. A prioritised bug list (critical, major, minor) with steps to reproduce, device/browser details, and screenshots or short Loom videos.
2. A concise UX critique highlighting friction points and quick-win improvements.
3. A performance snapshot (e.g., Lighthouse report) with recommendations.
4. Final re-test confirmation once fixes are applied.
Acceptance criteria: every critical and major issue identified, reproducible instructions provided, and no blocker bugs left after re-test.
If you’re meticulous with QA tools (BrowserStack, Chrome DevTools, OWASP ZAP, Lighthouse) and have a keen eye for user experience, I’d love your help to launch with confidence.