USPTO Office Action Response – U.S. Licensed Trademark Attorney Required
Budget: $30 – $250 USD
Title: USPTO Office Action Response – U.S. Licensed Trademark Attorney Required
We are seeking a U.S.-licensed trademark attorney to review and submit a response to a USPTO Office Action involving a Section 2(d) Likelihood of Confusion refusal.
Trademark:
CLOOE
Issue:
Likelihood of confusion refusal based on a cited registration (Section 2(d)).
Scope of Work:
Review our existing draft response and strategy.
Recommend any necessary legal revisions or improvements.
Prepare the final response if needed.
File the response with the USPTO as the attorney of record or authorized representative.
Requirements (Mandatory):
Must be a licensed U.S. attorney in good standing.
Must be eligible to represent clients before the USPTO.
Must have prior experience handling USPTO trademark Office Actions, particularly Section 2(d) refusals.
Must be willing to provide attorney name, state bar information, and verification of eligibility to practice before the USPTO before engagement.
Must be willing to sign an engagement agreement.
To save everyone's time, please do not apply if you are:
A trademark consultant.
A filing service.
A virtual assistant.
A non-attorney trademark provider.
Unable to file directly with the USPTO.
When applying, please include:
Your attorney name.
State(s) where you are licensed.
State bar number (or verification link).
Number of USPTO trademark matters handled.
Experience with Section 2(d) refusals.
Whether your quoted fee includes both review and filing.
Budget:
We already have an alternative filing option available and are primarily looking for a qualified attorney who can efficiently review and submit the response. Competitive proposals are welcome.
We are prepared to move quickly and can provide all relevant documents immediately.
We are seeking a U.S.-licensed trademark attorney to review and submit a response to a USPTO Office Action involving a Section 2(d) Likelihood of Confusion refusal.
Trademark:
CLOOE
Issue:
Likelihood of confusion refusal based on a cited registration (Section 2(d)).
Scope of Work:
Review our existing draft response and strategy.
Recommend any necessary legal revisions or improvements.
Prepare the final response if needed.
File the response with the USPTO as the attorney of record or authorized representative.
Requirements (Mandatory):
Must be a licensed U.S. attorney in good standing.
Must be eligible to represent clients before the USPTO.
Must have prior experience handling USPTO trademark Office Actions, particularly Section 2(d) refusals.
Must be willing to provide attorney name, state bar information, and verification of eligibility to practice before the USPTO before engagement.
Must be willing to sign an engagement agreement.
To save everyone's time, please do not apply if you are:
A trademark consultant.
A filing service.
A virtual assistant.
A non-attorney trademark provider.
Unable to file directly with the USPTO.
When applying, please include:
Your attorney name.
State(s) where you are licensed.
State bar number (or verification link).
Number of USPTO trademark matters handled.
Experience with Section 2(d) refusals.
Whether your quoted fee includes both review and filing.
Budget:
We already have an alternative filing option available and are primarily looking for a qualified attorney who can efficiently review and submit the response. Competitive proposals are welcome.
We are prepared to move quickly and can provide all relevant documents immediately.