Urgent 72-Hour QA Bug Hunt for Restaurant SaaS Platform — QR, POS, KDS, Payments, Invoices, Roles

Job ID: 40511301

Budget: ₹1,500 – ₹12,500 INR

I need fast, practical QA testing for a restaurant SaaS platform called OotaOS.

This is a rapid defect-discovery sprint, not a long corporate QA project. I already have structured QA workbooks, test scenarios, expected calculations, roles, modules, and defect templates.

Your job is to execute the assigned flows quickly, find real defects, capture evidence, and report them clearly.

I am looking for freelancers who can start immediately and work fast.

Anti-Spam Rule

Start your proposal with this exact line:

“I can execute a 72-hour OotaOS QA bug hunt with evidence.”

If your proposal does not start with this line, I will reject it.

Very Important

This is not simple website testing.

You must test flows like:

QR scan ordering
POS order creation
KDS kitchen order updates
menu and modifier setup
role permissions
Razorpay/Stripe test payments
discounts, tax, service charge, loyalty
invoices and reports
mobile responsive testing
multi-user ordering
admin and support screens
Timeline

I want this completed very fast.

Preferred timeline:

Day 0: Access setup and test account verification
Day 1: Auth, settings, menu, QR, POS
Day 2: Orders, KDS, payments, tax, invoices, reports
Day 3: Admin, Lite, known defects, retesting, final report

If you cannot work within 2–3 days, do not apply.

What I Will Provide

I will provide:

QA Execution Pack
Test accounts
Daily tester sheets
Mathematical validation sheet
QR testing pack
Defect tracker
Known defect list
Staging/test environment
Payment sandbox details if required
Scope for This Sprint

This sprint is focused on high-impact defects.

Priority areas:

P0 — Must Test
Login and role permissions
Restaurant settings
Menu creation and item availability
QR scan to menu
Customer order placement
POS order placement
KDS order lifecycle
Payment test flow
Tax/service/discount/invoice calculation
Reports showing correct order totals
Known defect retesting
P1 — Test If Time Allows
Waitlist
Reservations
Loyalty
Master admin
Support admin
AISI / AI support
Lite
Marketing partner
Evidence Required

For each defect, you must provide:

screenshot or video
exact user role
browser/device
exact navigation path
test data used
expected result
actual result
severity
whether it is reproducible

No evidence = no accepted defect.

Sample Calculation Required in Proposal

To prove you can test money flows, calculate this in your proposal:

Subtotal ₹2,000
Discount 10%
GST 5% on discounted base
Service charge 10% on discounted base
Tip ₹50

What is the final payable amount?

Expected Answer Format in Proposal

Please reply in this exact format:

1. Confirmation

Start with the required anti-spam line.

2. Availability

Tell me whether you can start immediately and how many hours you can work in the next 72 hours.

3. Device Details

Mention your laptop/browser and mobile devices available for testing.

4. Relevant Experience

Mention any experience with SaaS, POS, restaurant software, QR, payments, invoices, admin dashboards or Playwright.

5. Sample Calculation

Answer the calculation given above.

6. Your Testing Plan

Mention which modules you can cover in 72 hours.

7. Fixed Price

Give a fixed price for 72 hours or for assigned modules.

Payment Structure

I prefer milestone payment.

Milestone 1 — Setup Completed

Access verified, login tested, assigned scenarios confirmed.
Payment: 20%

Milestone 2 — Scenario Execution

Assigned scenarios executed with screenshots/videos.
Payment: 40%

Milestone 3 — Defect Report + Retest Notes

Valid defects submitted, duplicates removed, final report provided.
Payment: 40%

Rejection Rules

I will reject proposals if:

You do not start with the anti-spam line
You give a generic “I will test your website” response
You do not answer the sample calculation
You do not mention QR, POS, KDS, payment or invoice testing
You do not provide a fixed price
You cannot start immediately
You do not have at least one mobile device for testing
Final Note

I need fast defect discovery, not a fancy QA document. Apply only if you can execute immediately, follow the provided test pack, capture evidence, and report real defects clearly.