Validate RCC Design Software
Budget: ₹5,000 – ₹200,000 INR
I’m nearing completion of an automated RCC design tool that cuts the usual hand-calculation time down to minutes. Before I take it to market I need a certified structural engineer, well-versed in IS codes, to rigorously test every nook of the engine and confirm that the results are code-compliant and practically sound.
Scope of the check
– The software currently designs beams, columns, slabs , footing and can run a full-building analysis.
– It should be assessed strictly against the latest IS (Indian Standards) provisions for reinforced concrete.
– I want a deep-dive validation report, not a cursory overview: show representative input sets, trace the internal logic, compare my output with your hand or spreadsheet checks, and cite the exact IS clauses that govern each step.
– Any discrepancy should be paired with clear recommendations on how to align the algorithm or output formatting with the code.
Deliverables
1. A detailed calculation package (PDF or Excel) demonstrating independent checks.
2. A narrative report that:
• flags deviations from IS code,
• explains why they occur, and
• recommends concrete fixes.
3. A brief call or written memo summarising overall readiness and next steps.
Acceptance criteria
The job is complete once every tested element falls within code-permitted limits or I understand precisely what revisions are needed to reach compliance.
If you hold current structural engineering credentials and have recent hands-on experience with IS 456, IS 875, and allied standards, I’m eager to see how you would put my software through its paces.
Scope of the check
– The software currently designs beams, columns, slabs , footing and can run a full-building analysis.
– It should be assessed strictly against the latest IS (Indian Standards) provisions for reinforced concrete.
– I want a deep-dive validation report, not a cursory overview: show representative input sets, trace the internal logic, compare my output with your hand or spreadsheet checks, and cite the exact IS clauses that govern each step.
– Any discrepancy should be paired with clear recommendations on how to align the algorithm or output formatting with the code.
Deliverables
1. A detailed calculation package (PDF or Excel) demonstrating independent checks.
2. A narrative report that:
• flags deviations from IS code,
• explains why they occur, and
• recommends concrete fixes.
3. A brief call or written memo summarising overall readiness and next steps.
Acceptance criteria
The job is complete once every tested element falls within code-permitted limits or I understand precisely what revisions are needed to reach compliance.
If you hold current structural engineering credentials and have recent hands-on experience with IS 456, IS 875, and allied standards, I’m eager to see how you would put my software through its paces.