Experienced QA Engineers for SaaS Platform Testing

Job ID: 40063956

Budget: $5,000 – $10,000 USD

We are seeking immediately available QA engineers to execute structured manual QA testing on an enterprise SaaS platform. Speed and accuracy are critical.

This engagement is execution-focused, not exploratory or advisory.

We already have:

850+ pre-written test cases

Strict 1:1 feature-to-test-case mapping

Jira-ready workflows

Clear severity definitions and release gates

Your job is to run the tests, record results, and log high-quality bugs — fast.

What You Will Be Doing

Execute predefined manual test cases (no test design required)

Validate:

Core workflows

Permissions / role-based access

Negative and edge cases

Regression behavior

Mark pass/fail and add concise notes

Log clear, reproducible bugs in Jira with correct severity

Work in parallel with other QA testers by module

This is a hands-on execution role, not a documentation exercise.

Platform Scope

Modules include:

Operator (largest module)

Seller

Buyer

Investor

Broker

Vendor

You may be assigned one or more modules, depending on availability and speed.

Required Experience

5+ years QA experience on SaaS or enterprise platforms

Strong manual QA execution skills

Comfortable following structured test cases

Experience with Jira for bug tracking

Ability to start immediately

Strongly Preferred

Prior work on multi-module platforms

Experience testing permissions / access controls

Ability to work independently with minimal guidance

Automation experience is not required for this phase.

Timeline & Engagement

Immediate start

Short, intense execution window (1–2 weeks)

Remote

Contract-based

Potential follow-on work for regression cycles

How to Apply (Important)

Please include:

Your availability over the next 14 days

Your hourly rate

Examples of similar platforms you’ve tested

A brief description of how you write good bug reports

Generic applications will be declined.

Why This Is a Good Engagement

Clear scope (no guessing)

Fully prepared QA artifacts

Fast decision-making

Respect for QA as a critical function

Opportunity for repeat work

Question:
Briefly describe how you decide whether a bug should be marked Blocker vs High severity.