I need an academic writer for an Expert Report
Budget: $30 – $250 AUD
I need an Expert Report written about the 1978 M.H. de Young Museum in San Francisco Art Heist in the United States. Here is what needs to be done:
- Write an expert report explaining where security failed according to sound security theories and principles, either at the diagnosis-risk phase, design (Inference), engineering or operational failure (Treatment) or across multiple or all phases of museum security.
- Evaluate the heist events against the theories and principles covered this semester and draw on this information to highlight:
• Why the protection system was vulnerable to such an organised threat based on these theories and principles, and
• Consequently, why the Physical Protection System (PPS) failed accordant with the systems approach to physical security.
- Word limit 2500 words (+/- 10%). Weighting 60%
- Footnote referencing is required (minimum 15 references from: textbooks, academic journal articles, conference proceedings, open source information).
The layout of the report is inclusive of headings which are:
1. Purpose
2. Documents
3. List
4. Background information and Assumed Facts (Events)
5. Diagnosis of Threat or Risk: Relevant historical events
6. Relevant Literature: Security theories and principles
7. Analysis of Opinion: Summary analysis of events applying relevant professional opinion
8. References
Case Study Instructions:
For contemporary security professionals, risk arises from a combination of a threat exploiting some vulnerability such that it could cause some harm to an asset. Consequently, best practice in physical
security draws on:
a body of knowledge to diagnose the security problem (Security risk management),
inference to set the protection strategy and operational objectives, and
treatments to achieve an optimal solution with physical components that comply with relevant codes, technical notes, standards and guidelines.
Therefore, a security risk management plan determines the level of treatment controls required based on a facility’s risk rating, and are implemented in accordance with the theory of defence in depth. The theory of defence in depth aims to link layered security elements into a system incorporating people, technology, barriers and procedures to ensure a holistic and functional security system. According to Garcia (2001, p. 6), the theory of Defence in Depth should be implemented in security management using
a systems approach. This view is supported by many published security authors (Underwood, 1984; Fennelly, 1997; Fisher & Green, 2003) where it is argued that security should be seen as a whole, and both designed and operated as a system. Nevertheless, there have been many times when well-developed Physical Protection Systems (PPS) have succumbed to the planning and determination of an adversary group.
Special Instructions:
Word Limit 2500 Words (+/- 10%).
Weighting: 60%
Unlike Assignment 1, this assessment requires footnoting referencing.
To successfully complete this assignment, you must demonstrate a strong level of research and use a minimum of 15 references from:
Textbooks
Academic Journal Articles
Conference Proceedings
Open Source Information
- Write an expert report explaining where security failed according to sound security theories and principles, either at the diagnosis-risk phase, design (Inference), engineering or operational failure (Treatment) or across multiple or all phases of museum security.
- Evaluate the heist events against the theories and principles covered this semester and draw on this information to highlight:
• Why the protection system was vulnerable to such an organised threat based on these theories and principles, and
• Consequently, why the Physical Protection System (PPS) failed accordant with the systems approach to physical security.
- Word limit 2500 words (+/- 10%). Weighting 60%
- Footnote referencing is required (minimum 15 references from: textbooks, academic journal articles, conference proceedings, open source information).
The layout of the report is inclusive of headings which are:
1. Purpose
2. Documents
3. List
4. Background information and Assumed Facts (Events)
5. Diagnosis of Threat or Risk: Relevant historical events
6. Relevant Literature: Security theories and principles
7. Analysis of Opinion: Summary analysis of events applying relevant professional opinion
8. References
Case Study Instructions:
For contemporary security professionals, risk arises from a combination of a threat exploiting some vulnerability such that it could cause some harm to an asset. Consequently, best practice in physical
security draws on:
a body of knowledge to diagnose the security problem (Security risk management),
inference to set the protection strategy and operational objectives, and
treatments to achieve an optimal solution with physical components that comply with relevant codes, technical notes, standards and guidelines.
Therefore, a security risk management plan determines the level of treatment controls required based on a facility’s risk rating, and are implemented in accordance with the theory of defence in depth. The theory of defence in depth aims to link layered security elements into a system incorporating people, technology, barriers and procedures to ensure a holistic and functional security system. According to Garcia (2001, p. 6), the theory of Defence in Depth should be implemented in security management using
a systems approach. This view is supported by many published security authors (Underwood, 1984; Fennelly, 1997; Fisher & Green, 2003) where it is argued that security should be seen as a whole, and both designed and operated as a system. Nevertheless, there have been many times when well-developed Physical Protection Systems (PPS) have succumbed to the planning and determination of an adversary group.
Special Instructions:
Word Limit 2500 Words (+/- 10%).
Weighting: 60%
Unlike Assignment 1, this assessment requires footnoting referencing.
To successfully complete this assignment, you must demonstrate a strong level of research and use a minimum of 15 references from:
Textbooks
Academic Journal Articles
Conference Proceedings
Open Source Information