SAR Review for Small Molecules -- 2
Budget: $250 – $750 USD
I’m putting together a thorough, literature-backed review that zeroes in on structure-activity relationships (SAR) for small-molecule therapeutics. The end product will serve as a publishable manuscript (or a polished internal white paper) that maps out current SAR trends, key methodologies, and illustrative case studies across multiple therapeutic areas.
Here’s the scope I have in mind:
• Search, curate, and critically evaluate the most recent peer-reviewed papers, patents, and authoritative databases relevant to small-molecule SAR.
• Organize the discussion around fundamental SAR principles, experimental and in-silico techniques, and representative lead-optimization stories.
• Include clear visual aids—figures, tables, or SAR heat maps—built with tools like ChemDraw, MOE, or other cheminformatics platforms you already use.
• Deliver a fully referenced document (~8,000–10,000 words) in Word format, plus a separate, citation-ready bibliography (EndNote, BibTeX, or plain .docx).
Acceptance criteria
1. Comprehensive coverage with critical analysis, not just a summary.
2. References formatted consistently (ACS or another widely accepted style).
3. Graphics supplied as editable originals.
4. Draft ready for my review by week three, final version delivered within the one-month window.
If this sounds like your wheelhouse, let’s talk and lock in the outline so you can get started right away.
Here’s the scope I have in mind:
• Search, curate, and critically evaluate the most recent peer-reviewed papers, patents, and authoritative databases relevant to small-molecule SAR.
• Organize the discussion around fundamental SAR principles, experimental and in-silico techniques, and representative lead-optimization stories.
• Include clear visual aids—figures, tables, or SAR heat maps—built with tools like ChemDraw, MOE, or other cheminformatics platforms you already use.
• Deliver a fully referenced document (~8,000–10,000 words) in Word format, plus a separate, citation-ready bibliography (EndNote, BibTeX, or plain .docx).
Acceptance criteria
1. Comprehensive coverage with critical analysis, not just a summary.
2. References formatted consistently (ACS or another widely accepted style).
3. Graphics supplied as editable originals.
4. Draft ready for my review by week three, final version delivered within the one-month window.
If this sounds like your wheelhouse, let’s talk and lock in the outline so you can get started right away.