Philosophy Research paper Writer needed ASAP!! -- 2
Budget: $30 – $250 CAD
Hello, I need your help with something, So I have a philosophy research paper I need you to do for me. Basically, you need to write a 6-8 page essay of cogent argument on any one of the articles you like, see them below:
A1. P. Maher, “Contemplative Friendship in Nicomachean Ethics,” Review of Metaphysics 65:4 (Jun
2012) 765 – 94
A2. R.I.G. Hughes, “Hume’s Second Enquiry: Ethics as Natural Science,” History of Philosophy
Quarterly 2:3 (Jul 1985) 291 – 307
A3. S. Tenenbaum, “The Idea of Freedom and Moral Cognition in Groundwork III,”
Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 84:3 (May 2012) 555 – 89
A4. J. Marshall, “The Proof of Utility and Equity in Mill’s Utilitarianism,” Canadian Journal of
Philosophy 3:1 (Sep 1973) 13 – 26
To understand the paper a little bit more read this?
****The first half of your paper is reserved for describing the main argument advanced by the author(s) in the article indicated (locate all your research in this section); the second half is reserved for your critical evaluation of something – whether concept, claim, or argument – already mentioned in the descriptive half of your work****
There are rules for this paper which I will give you in my shorter version and the original one. I need the paper done in 2 days. So yeah, are you willing to do this for the price?
A1. P. Maher, “Contemplative Friendship in Nicomachean Ethics,” Review of Metaphysics 65:4 (Jun
2012) 765 – 94
A2. R.I.G. Hughes, “Hume’s Second Enquiry: Ethics as Natural Science,” History of Philosophy
Quarterly 2:3 (Jul 1985) 291 – 307
A3. S. Tenenbaum, “The Idea of Freedom and Moral Cognition in Groundwork III,”
Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 84:3 (May 2012) 555 – 89
A4. J. Marshall, “The Proof of Utility and Equity in Mill’s Utilitarianism,” Canadian Journal of
Philosophy 3:1 (Sep 1973) 13 – 26
To understand the paper a little bit more read this?
****The first half of your paper is reserved for describing the main argument advanced by the author(s) in the article indicated (locate all your research in this section); the second half is reserved for your critical evaluation of something – whether concept, claim, or argument – already mentioned in the descriptive half of your work****
There are rules for this paper which I will give you in my shorter version and the original one. I need the paper done in 2 days. So yeah, are you willing to do this for the price?