Master's on International Law dissertation
Budget: $250 – $750 USD
The objective of this work is to discuss the principles of non-intervention and sovereignty and analyse this theme in the context of NATO's intervention in Libya, mainly by observing if there has been legitimacy in the intervention or not and listing the consequences of this event.
The idea of the French Revolution has been disseminated throughout the globe, which is: democracy is essential to individual and collective aspirations and to the articulation of interests; economic liberalism is the system that will lead to social welfare and development; and that man is universal and that his natural rights must be guaranteed.
However, the concepts "democracy", "liberalism" and "human rights" are legally indeterminated and there is no consensus, regional or global, of what they are or should be.
With this, the western leaderships preach their social, political and economic model, under the justification that democracy and the market economy will transform the planet into a peaceful international society free from all the problems that are historically observed: hunger, misery, religious and ethnic wars. One can perceive that, once again, all thought developed about human rights and aspirations of peace and justice remains distant from reality. This is part of the "International society" model that was built by the Westphalia Peace Treaties (1648), which the pillars are the principle of non-intervention, the sovereignty of States and the unilaterality in recourse to coercion or even war.
Those who hold power use the humanitarian law as a moral imperative for the international community, moving away the sovereignty from the State and ignoring the principle of non-intervention.
The right of interference can also be regarded as a new phase of aggressive expansionism of the old neocolonial system. The right became a duty (of humanitarian interference), and began to demand freedom of access and action, in areas of natural or social catastrophe, for non-governmental organizations.
The idea of the French Revolution has been disseminated throughout the globe, which is: democracy is essential to individual and collective aspirations and to the articulation of interests; economic liberalism is the system that will lead to social welfare and development; and that man is universal and that his natural rights must be guaranteed.
However, the concepts "democracy", "liberalism" and "human rights" are legally indeterminated and there is no consensus, regional or global, of what they are or should be.
With this, the western leaderships preach their social, political and economic model, under the justification that democracy and the market economy will transform the planet into a peaceful international society free from all the problems that are historically observed: hunger, misery, religious and ethnic wars. One can perceive that, once again, all thought developed about human rights and aspirations of peace and justice remains distant from reality. This is part of the "International society" model that was built by the Westphalia Peace Treaties (1648), which the pillars are the principle of non-intervention, the sovereignty of States and the unilaterality in recourse to coercion or even war.
Those who hold power use the humanitarian law as a moral imperative for the international community, moving away the sovereignty from the State and ignoring the principle of non-intervention.
The right of interference can also be regarded as a new phase of aggressive expansionism of the old neocolonial system. The right became a duty (of humanitarian interference), and began to demand freedom of access and action, in areas of natural or social catastrophe, for non-governmental organizations.