Critical Literature Review about Net-zero, the phasing out of gas boilers and the impact this will have on british gas

I am seeking a professional literature review as part of my research into the impacts of net-zero and phasing out gas boilers on British Gas. Specifically, I would like the freelancer to focus on the impact this will have on British Gas. The review should 1200 words. Furthermore, while I am not providing specific sources, I would like the freelancer to include some suggestions. I expect the freelancer to provide a thorough literature review that is well-sourced and utilizes reliable literature to address my queries. They should also ensure that the review is properly written and organized for effective communication of the research. I can also provide the assigment brief, and the powerpoint that i created which this literature review is supposed to be based upon.
Your presentation (Element 1) introduced your research question, aim &
objectives, and justification. This element of the portfolio ought to present
literature review for your chosen research topic. The research topic ought to be
within the research boundaries set by: implications/consequences/effects,
specific UK business/industry, specific UK Net Zero policy (or policies). It is an
individual written report (max 1,200 words, +/- 10%).
The report ought to be structured as follows:
 Background (max 200 words): brief overview of your topic, research
question, aim & objectives, and justification.
 Critical literature review (max 1,000 words): brief overview of literature
review method (literature review questions, keywords, and sources),
critical literature review of sources.
 References: complete list of all sources used that follows Harvard
convention.
The marking criteria (see below) assess the following aspects:
 Critical Literature Review: You must compare and contrast the different
views (pros and cons, costs and benefits, advantages and disadvantages,
etc.) relevant to your research objectives (or parts of it). You must refer
to refereed journal articles and up-to-date
industry/business/government reports/data. [30 marks]
 Presentation: Layout, structure, flow, grammar, format, background. [10
marks]
 Referencing: you should ensure that you cite and reference all your
sources according to the Harvard convention. If you have doubts about
how to use this convention, refer to the online Harvard Referencing
Guide. You should include references to all cited sources in a single list at
the end of your report (these are not counted). [10 marks]
2
Marking Criteria/Rubric
Critical
literature
review (30)
Literature
review
method
and
sources
used (5)
5 Extensive and relevant reading (15+ sources). Up-to-date and
balanced (academic and reports) sources have been used. Clear
and transparent literature review method used in identifying
relevant sources.
4 Good and relevant reading (10-15 sources). Balanced sources
used (academic and reports), however some sources used are not
current. Some overview of literature review method.
2-3 Adequate/Limited range of relevant readings (<10 sources). Not
all sources are academic or reports, some dubious sources used.
Very limited overview of literature review method.
0-1 Very limited range of reading, limited use of either academic or
industry/business/government reports. Uses dubious sources. No
overview of literature review method.
Critical
review of
sources
(25)
25-
21
Evidence of a full grasp of the material and critical evaluation of
the literature. Clear understanding of key issues and debates.
Cleary aligned with the research objectives.
20-
14
Good grasp of the literature. Compares and contrasts different
sources. The discussion could be more critical. Could be better
aligned with the research objectives.
13-
6
Adequate/Limited grasp of the subject. The discussion is
informative, but mainly descriptive, lacks critical aspect. Limited
alignment with the research objectives.
0-5 Poor/No grasp of the literature. Vaguely or unrelated to the
research objectives. Literature reviewed is outside the required
research boundaries.
Presentation
(10)
8-
10
The report follows required structure; well presented; fluently
written, no grammatical or formatting errors. Excellent
background section covering all required aspects.
6-7 Format requirements have been followed; clearly written. Little
editing needed, some grammatical errors. Good background
section covering most of required aspects.
4-5 The report does not entirely follow the required structure. Some
editing is needed to improve format and writing. In places,
writing style has to be more formal/professional. Grammatical
errors, unclear or limited background.
0-3 The required structured has not been followed. Writing is not
clear in places, numerous grammatical errors. In-depth editing is
needed. No or poor background.
Referencing
(10)
8-
10
Accurate use of Harvard referencing, both with in-text citations
and list of references.
6-7 Largely accurate use of Harvard referencing with some minor
incorrect in-text citations and references.
4-5 An attempt has been made to use the Harvard referencing,
however there are numerous errors either with in-text citations
or list of references.
0-3 Poor or incorrect use of Harvard referencing.

I WOULD LIKE THIS COMPLETED BY FRIDAY 17TH, SATURDAY 18TH 3PM GMT+1 AT THE LATEST