Article Revision and Critique Correction
Budget: $30 – $250 USD
Two referees have reviewed my article, and I am seeking a professional to assist with addressing their critiques. The article's subject concerns fuzzy logic and urban open-space design. Word count: 7157 (Excluding bibliography). The article format is word, and I used Mendeley for citations. The review has highlighted issues in various article areas, including grammar and language, content and arguments, and formatting and citations.
Key Requirements:
- Correcting language and grammar errors
- Addressing content and argument critiques
- Fixing formatting and citation issues
- Conducting additional research as suggested by the referees
- Integrating new references throughout the article
Ideal Skills:
- Strong command of English grammar and style
- Experience in academic writing and editing
- Familiarity with various citation formats
- Research skills
I will provide the referees' comments and all necessary information. I am looking for someone who can deliver a revised version of the article that adequately addresses the referees' critiques and improves the overall quality of the piece.
Reviewers comments:
- The title and the abstract must be revised.
- The paper must contain newer and more significant information adequate to
justify publication.
- The paper does not demonstrate an adequate understanding of the relevant
literature in the field and cite an appropriate range of literature sources.
Some significant works are ignored.
- The paper's argument is not built on an appropriate base of theory,
concepts, or other ideas. The research on which the paper is based has not
been well designed.
- The conclusions do not adequately tie together the other elements of the
paper.
- The paper does not bridge the gap between theory and practice. It is unclear how the research can be used in practice (economic and commercial
impact), in teaching, to influence public policy, in research (contributing
to the body of knowledge). The impact of research on society (influencing
public attitudes, affecting quality of life) is not explained well. These
implications are not consistent with the findings and conclusions of the
paper.
- The conclusion section must be developed.
- The article should be reviewed/controlled in terms of usage of academic
language, language fluency, and grammar by an English proofreader.
- While the corrected article is resubmitted to the system, an explanation
a document explaining in detail whether the referee and editor's corrections
given for the article has been made comparing the old and the new
version of the paper must be added to the system as a supplementary document.
We believe that as soon as the specified corrections are made, the paper
will turn into a good, original research article.
Key Requirements:
- Correcting language and grammar errors
- Addressing content and argument critiques
- Fixing formatting and citation issues
- Conducting additional research as suggested by the referees
- Integrating new references throughout the article
Ideal Skills:
- Strong command of English grammar and style
- Experience in academic writing and editing
- Familiarity with various citation formats
- Research skills
I will provide the referees' comments and all necessary information. I am looking for someone who can deliver a revised version of the article that adequately addresses the referees' critiques and improves the overall quality of the piece.
Reviewers comments:
- The title and the abstract must be revised.
- The paper must contain newer and more significant information adequate to
justify publication.
- The paper does not demonstrate an adequate understanding of the relevant
literature in the field and cite an appropriate range of literature sources.
Some significant works are ignored.
- The paper's argument is not built on an appropriate base of theory,
concepts, or other ideas. The research on which the paper is based has not
been well designed.
- The conclusions do not adequately tie together the other elements of the
paper.
- The paper does not bridge the gap between theory and practice. It is unclear how the research can be used in practice (economic and commercial
impact), in teaching, to influence public policy, in research (contributing
to the body of knowledge). The impact of research on society (influencing
public attitudes, affecting quality of life) is not explained well. These
implications are not consistent with the findings and conclusions of the
paper.
- The conclusion section must be developed.
- The article should be reviewed/controlled in terms of usage of academic
language, language fluency, and grammar by an English proofreader.
- While the corrected article is resubmitted to the system, an explanation
a document explaining in detail whether the referee and editor's corrections
given for the article has been made comparing the old and the new
version of the paper must be added to the system as a supplementary document.
We believe that as soon as the specified corrections are made, the paper
will turn into a good, original research article.