Advanced research Methods
Budget: £10 – £20 GBP
Advanced research Methods for PhD level (approx. 5,000 to 5500). This should demonstrate how my research design links to my research question, outline your research strategy (e.g. justification for case/sample selection), and describe data collection and analysis procedures followed in the study.
Critical writing at a high level of methodology, without plagiarism.
Based on the above picture (research onion) requires the definition and discussion of each episode, starting with philosophies and ending with data collection.
What is required is to define each philosophy and compare it with the other, and then justify the philosophy that will be adopted in this research.
For example, clarifying what is (positivism) from the point of view of more than one researcher and what it supports, and then constructivism (interpertivism) as well as (pragmatism) and then define and justify the philosophy for this research, which is (interpertivism) as it supports qualitative research.
RESEARCH PHILOSOPHY: These assumptions are of three types:
• Ontological assumptions.
• Epistemological assumptions.
• Axiological assumptions -
Thus, discussing the rest of the episodes in detail with the identification and justification of the choice for this research
Where the red circles represent my selection for this research (qualitative research Methods).
Divide and count words according to what is specified below.
Based on the context and background of the research, including my research questions
a. Research design (3000 words)
In this section, a critique of philosophies, approaches, strategies, and methods is explained, as shown above (in the picture), and a comparison with the identification and justification of choosing this research. (The red circles represent the chosen method for the researcher).
Justifications for choosing qualitative research
Disadvantages of quantitative and mixed research.
Discuss debates around the strengths and weaknesses of your research design and methods, as well as your data analysis strategy.
b. Methodology (2000 words)
In this section,
1 a discussion of the tools that will be adopted in this research (Case study, semi-structured Interviews, focused group discussion) (focus on interviews) in terms of the concept according to several researchers, the strengths and weaknesses, why they were chosen... What obstacles may happen during the interviews and how the researcher can overcome them?
2 As well as discussing the steps of data analysis according to (thematic analysis) in detail.
c. Reflexivity (500 words)
Here is a discussion of reflexivity and the researcher's voice in detail in terms of interviews and research according to the confiscation referred to below.
Consider the implications of methodological rigour and clarity, the value of reflexivity and research voice in qualitative work and highlight the challenges that are specific to your research proposal. Discuss debates around the strengths and weaknesses of your research design and methods, as well as your data analysis strategy.
Critical writing at a high level of methodology, without plagiarism.
Based on the above picture (research onion) requires the definition and discussion of each episode, starting with philosophies and ending with data collection.
What is required is to define each philosophy and compare it with the other, and then justify the philosophy that will be adopted in this research.
For example, clarifying what is (positivism) from the point of view of more than one researcher and what it supports, and then constructivism (interpertivism) as well as (pragmatism) and then define and justify the philosophy for this research, which is (interpertivism) as it supports qualitative research.
RESEARCH PHILOSOPHY: These assumptions are of three types:
• Ontological assumptions.
• Epistemological assumptions.
• Axiological assumptions -
Thus, discussing the rest of the episodes in detail with the identification and justification of the choice for this research
Where the red circles represent my selection for this research (qualitative research Methods).
Divide and count words according to what is specified below.
Based on the context and background of the research, including my research questions
a. Research design (3000 words)
In this section, a critique of philosophies, approaches, strategies, and methods is explained, as shown above (in the picture), and a comparison with the identification and justification of choosing this research. (The red circles represent the chosen method for the researcher).
Justifications for choosing qualitative research
Disadvantages of quantitative and mixed research.
Discuss debates around the strengths and weaknesses of your research design and methods, as well as your data analysis strategy.
b. Methodology (2000 words)
In this section,
1 a discussion of the tools that will be adopted in this research (Case study, semi-structured Interviews, focused group discussion) (focus on interviews) in terms of the concept according to several researchers, the strengths and weaknesses, why they were chosen... What obstacles may happen during the interviews and how the researcher can overcome them?
2 As well as discussing the steps of data analysis according to (thematic analysis) in detail.
c. Reflexivity (500 words)
Here is a discussion of reflexivity and the researcher's voice in detail in terms of interviews and research according to the confiscation referred to below.
Consider the implications of methodological rigour and clarity, the value of reflexivity and research voice in qualitative work and highlight the challenges that are specific to your research proposal. Discuss debates around the strengths and weaknesses of your research design and methods, as well as your data analysis strategy.