Corporate governance based analysis for company X board directors evaluation.
Budget: $30 – $250 USD
Corporate governance based analysis for company X board directors evaluation.
Write about company X challenge in corporate governance and stakeholder relations as it plays out ; discuss the challenge; and, drawing on corporate governance best practice in similar contexts and academic literature, as appropriate, propose your a solution.
The report should show:
* Clarity of description: flow and lucidity of writing
* Accuracy of analysis
* Fitness of solution: logic of argument for solution chosen; quality and insight of solution.
————
Company X has 5 board members:
1 executive the ceo, 2 shareholders and 2 independent directors.
The issue is that the evaluation is done annually and internally as peer review during the meeting the final meeting each year.
There isn’t any external evaluation and the other stakeholders don’t have any input in the evaluation and there isn’t any regulation that requires external or other stakeholders input when it comes to board evaluation.
The problem is that they want to keep their seats on the board, while not all have positive input and some don’t have the right knowledge about the ever changing landscape of IT services.
Which means they don’t add value as expected and slow down the ceo process of changing any services or offerings and plans to adopt new services.
The selection of the independent members was based on reputation in business community not based on experience in the IT sector.
If there was a different mechanism for board evaluation this would push members to do better or leave the board.
Write about company X challenge in corporate governance and stakeholder relations as it plays out ; discuss the challenge; and, drawing on corporate governance best practice in similar contexts and academic literature, as appropriate, propose your a solution.
The report should show:
* Clarity of description: flow and lucidity of writing
* Accuracy of analysis
* Fitness of solution: logic of argument for solution chosen; quality and insight of solution.
————
Company X has 5 board members:
1 executive the ceo, 2 shareholders and 2 independent directors.
The issue is that the evaluation is done annually and internally as peer review during the meeting the final meeting each year.
There isn’t any external evaluation and the other stakeholders don’t have any input in the evaluation and there isn’t any regulation that requires external or other stakeholders input when it comes to board evaluation.
The problem is that they want to keep their seats on the board, while not all have positive input and some don’t have the right knowledge about the ever changing landscape of IT services.
Which means they don’t add value as expected and slow down the ceo process of changing any services or offerings and plans to adopt new services.
The selection of the independent members was based on reputation in business community not based on experience in the IT sector.
If there was a different mechanism for board evaluation this would push members to do better or leave the board.