Improve by Re-writing and Proofread/ Edit Academic paper
Budget: $30 – $250 USD
I require this in 24 hours Please proofread using Grammarly business premium or Turnitin
The following also needs to be corrected:
This article is generally descriptive and lacks sufficient legal analysis. It is not clearly structured and frequently loses it track. The content covers a lot of relevant issues but lacks a clear focus.
The research questions are not clearly defined and the manuscript has just provided a descriptive account of the law relevant to e-commerce in Vietnam. There could be an elaboration on the research methodologies. It should clearly state the reasons for comparing the Indonesia approach with the Vietnamese approach. What is the feasibility of the comparison, what are the criteria for selecting jurisdictions for comparison and what novel knowledge does it bring to this paper?
Moreover, it will be beneficial for the paper to critically evaluate the e-commerce legal system in Vietnam with consideration of the relevant sectors of laws and regulations, and further discuss the implications of the legal system governing e-commerce in cross-border transactions.
There are glaring spelling and grammatical errors. The use of the English language could have been improved.
The piece is largely descriptive without diving deep into a clearly defined research question. There could be an elaboration on the research methodologies. It should clearly state the reasons for comparing the Indonesia approach with the Vietnamese approach.
It will be beneficial for the paper to critically evaluate the e-commerce legal system in Vietnam with consideration of the relevant sectors of laws and regulations, and further discuss the implications of the legal system governing e-commerce in cross-border transactions.
The following also needs to be corrected:
This article is generally descriptive and lacks sufficient legal analysis. It is not clearly structured and frequently loses it track. The content covers a lot of relevant issues but lacks a clear focus.
The research questions are not clearly defined and the manuscript has just provided a descriptive account of the law relevant to e-commerce in Vietnam. There could be an elaboration on the research methodologies. It should clearly state the reasons for comparing the Indonesia approach with the Vietnamese approach. What is the feasibility of the comparison, what are the criteria for selecting jurisdictions for comparison and what novel knowledge does it bring to this paper?
Moreover, it will be beneficial for the paper to critically evaluate the e-commerce legal system in Vietnam with consideration of the relevant sectors of laws and regulations, and further discuss the implications of the legal system governing e-commerce in cross-border transactions.
There are glaring spelling and grammatical errors. The use of the English language could have been improved.
The piece is largely descriptive without diving deep into a clearly defined research question. There could be an elaboration on the research methodologies. It should clearly state the reasons for comparing the Indonesia approach with the Vietnamese approach.
It will be beneficial for the paper to critically evaluate the e-commerce legal system in Vietnam with consideration of the relevant sectors of laws and regulations, and further discuss the implications of the legal system governing e-commerce in cross-border transactions.
Related categories:
Proofreading
Health & Medicine
Artificial Intelligence
Research Writing
Legal Writing