Evaluate English grammar questions and answers (in 7-point Likert scale)
Budget: $15 – $25 USD
I am looking for English grammar experts to evaluate English grammar questions and answers. You will see the English grammar questions posted on an online forum with several answers written by random people.
We have collected approximately 12,000 Q&A combinations from an online English grammar community and are seeking participants to assist in accurately labeling whether the answers to these grammar-related questions are correct or not. Participants will be asked to review each Q&A pair and respond to a series of questions using a 1-7 Likert scale. As compensation, participants will receive $20 for every 100 Q&A combinations they evaluate. Each pair could be as short as 2-3 sentences or a paragraph at most, and the same question may appear in different pairs.
Your key responsibility is to evaluate each answer's truthfulness, convincingness, and believability on a 7-point Likert scale. Below is a sample of the work:
<Question>
Would it be correct to use "whose" in this sentence?
I'm writing a short story and I can't figure out what word to use in this sentence and some help would be much appreciated:
"In her sleep, her soul was carried to Death's Door, \[whose\] incredible arches welcomed the end of all things."
For context: I'm trying to literalise the concept of 'being at death's door' - describing it as something physical rather than figurative, but the word "whose" implies that I'm talking about a person, while here I'm talking about an object. What would be the correct substitute? I originally thought it would be "thats" (without the apostrophe) but it's not a word.
<Answer>
You're right, "whose" makes it read like a person rather than an object. I'd probably break up the sentence so the "its" doesn't read so funny in the center.
>In her sleep, her soul was carried to Death's Door. Its incredible arches welcomed the end of all things.
You will evaluate the above answer's
1. Truthfulness (1-7)
2. convincingness (1-7)
3. believability (1-7)
Due to the nature of the work, we are seeking candidates with:
• Strong experience in English writing
• Excellent English writing skills
• Native English speaker residing in North America
Accuracy and thoughtful evaluation are essential for this task. To ensure high-quality responses, participants will be asked to commit to evaluating each Q&A pair with care. If responses are found to be unusable or of insufficient quality, we may need to withhold compensation.
Our task requires a strong understanding of English grammar, and therefore, this opportunity is particularly suited for experts in English-related fields who are interested in applying their skills in a practical setting while earning extra income. Participation in this task will also contribute to the expansion of knowledge and societal implications.
We have collected approximately 12,000 Q&A combinations from an online English grammar community and are seeking participants to assist in accurately labeling whether the answers to these grammar-related questions are correct or not. Participants will be asked to review each Q&A pair and respond to a series of questions using a 1-7 Likert scale. As compensation, participants will receive $20 for every 100 Q&A combinations they evaluate. Each pair could be as short as 2-3 sentences or a paragraph at most, and the same question may appear in different pairs.
Your key responsibility is to evaluate each answer's truthfulness, convincingness, and believability on a 7-point Likert scale. Below is a sample of the work:
<Question>
Would it be correct to use "whose" in this sentence?
I'm writing a short story and I can't figure out what word to use in this sentence and some help would be much appreciated:
"In her sleep, her soul was carried to Death's Door, \[whose\] incredible arches welcomed the end of all things."
For context: I'm trying to literalise the concept of 'being at death's door' - describing it as something physical rather than figurative, but the word "whose" implies that I'm talking about a person, while here I'm talking about an object. What would be the correct substitute? I originally thought it would be "thats" (without the apostrophe) but it's not a word.
<Answer>
You're right, "whose" makes it read like a person rather than an object. I'd probably break up the sentence so the "its" doesn't read so funny in the center.
>In her sleep, her soul was carried to Death's Door. Its incredible arches welcomed the end of all things.
You will evaluate the above answer's
1. Truthfulness (1-7)
2. convincingness (1-7)
3. believability (1-7)
Due to the nature of the work, we are seeking candidates with:
• Strong experience in English writing
• Excellent English writing skills
• Native English speaker residing in North America
Accuracy and thoughtful evaluation are essential for this task. To ensure high-quality responses, participants will be asked to commit to evaluating each Q&A pair with care. If responses are found to be unusable or of insufficient quality, we may need to withhold compensation.
Our task requires a strong understanding of English grammar, and therefore, this opportunity is particularly suited for experts in English-related fields who are interested in applying their skills in a practical setting while earning extra income. Participation in this task will also contribute to the expansion of knowledge and societal implications.