Civil Law Deep Dive
Budget: $100 – $400 USD
Quality legal research is sought for several issues. Answers should include items that apply to each question:
1) Federal and Oregon statutes
2) Medford OR District Court Rules
3) Rules of Civil Procedure
4) Citations of precedent setting cases (preferably in Supreme Court or 6th district) for Plaintiff & Defense sides
5) Citations in Blue Book format so relevant parts can be found easily
6) Brief explanations for items where it would be of benefit.
Just facts; no flowery writing
Items for research:
1) Can a plaintiff in federal court change the address of the defendant corporation from in-state to out of state to meet diversity requirements?
2) Hacking into a privately owned website and placing malware there. Their motive was to squash public knowledge of their illegal and unethical behavior plus give pointers of how to best sue them if there was cause.
3) Civil rights issues because the website hack restricted the site owner's free speech as users' anti-malware software prevented them from visiting it or adversely affected their computers
4) Conspiracy charges because in a large corporation there must have been >1 person approving, planning and hacking.
5) Way of stating/showing sufficient proof for “preponderance of evidence” when all evidence of the hacking (so far) is circumstantial. I know the 51% rule.
6) As above but for punitive damages where "clear and convincing" evidence is needed.
7) Pertaining to Oregon medical malpractice (MMP) regarding the need to invoke tolling because the statute of limitations expired (ORS 12.160). Examples for each if Plaintiff's mental health conditions were caused by:
A) Physiological problems due to MMP
B) Psychological problems due to MMP
C) Stress of realizing life long impact because of MMP
D) Factors unrelated to MMP but which caused some of the delay in filing Complaint
E) What are determining factors if a client did not perform their responsibiltiy to inform a practitioner of abnormal symptoms therefore making a MMP charge moot.
8) Tolling statutes and case law in non-MMP cases (Federal or Oregon) which could be applied to MMP cases.
Please bid only if you are have a track record of doing legal research and will do a thorough top quality job for a fair price. Please ask questions, now or if you get the job.
1) Federal and Oregon statutes
2) Medford OR District Court Rules
3) Rules of Civil Procedure
4) Citations of precedent setting cases (preferably in Supreme Court or 6th district) for Plaintiff & Defense sides
5) Citations in Blue Book format so relevant parts can be found easily
6) Brief explanations for items where it would be of benefit.
Just facts; no flowery writing
Items for research:
1) Can a plaintiff in federal court change the address of the defendant corporation from in-state to out of state to meet diversity requirements?
2) Hacking into a privately owned website and placing malware there. Their motive was to squash public knowledge of their illegal and unethical behavior plus give pointers of how to best sue them if there was cause.
3) Civil rights issues because the website hack restricted the site owner's free speech as users' anti-malware software prevented them from visiting it or adversely affected their computers
4) Conspiracy charges because in a large corporation there must have been >1 person approving, planning and hacking.
5) Way of stating/showing sufficient proof for “preponderance of evidence” when all evidence of the hacking (so far) is circumstantial. I know the 51% rule.
6) As above but for punitive damages where "clear and convincing" evidence is needed.
7) Pertaining to Oregon medical malpractice (MMP) regarding the need to invoke tolling because the statute of limitations expired (ORS 12.160). Examples for each if Plaintiff's mental health conditions were caused by:
A) Physiological problems due to MMP
B) Psychological problems due to MMP
C) Stress of realizing life long impact because of MMP
D) Factors unrelated to MMP but which caused some of the delay in filing Complaint
E) What are determining factors if a client did not perform their responsibiltiy to inform a practitioner of abnormal symptoms therefore making a MMP charge moot.
8) Tolling statutes and case law in non-MMP cases (Federal or Oregon) which could be applied to MMP cases.
Please bid only if you are have a track record of doing legal research and will do a thorough top quality job for a fair price. Please ask questions, now or if you get the job.