Writ Petition Drafting for Bombay High Court - need some one who can assist at Bombay High court and filing as well
Budget: ₹1,500 – ₹12,500 INR
Project Title: Professional Legal Drafting – Writ Petition (Criminal) for Bombay High Court (Party-in-Person)
Project Description:
I am seeking an expert legal researcher and drafter with extensive experience in Indian Criminal Law and High Court Writ Jurisdiction. I require the drafting of a Writ Petition to be filed before the Hon’ble Bombay High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and/or Section 528 of BNSS 2023 (formerly Section 482 CrPC).
The petitioner is a PhD holder and a former UPSC aspirant who intends to appear as a Party-in-Person. The petition will challenge the illegalities in the investigation of FIR No. 96/2025 (Cyber Crime Police Station, Pune) involving sections 318(4), 319(2) of BNS 2023, and Section 66(D) of the IT Act.
Key Grounds to be Covered in the Petition:
Violation of Arrest Procedures: The arrest occurred on 20/09/2025 at 03:00 PM, yet the Charge Sheet falsely records it as 21/09/2025 at 03:15 AM. This is a direct violation of D.K. Basu v. State of West Bengal and Section 35 of BNSS.
Custodial Torture & Human Rights Violations: Evidence of physical abuse and the use of electric shocks during custody at the Pune Cyber Crime PS, including the deliberate switching off of CCTV cameras.
Procedural Illegalities in Search & Seizure: Contradictory timings in the House Search/Seizure forms. Unauthorized access to seized gadgets by a "third-party expert" without the presence of the accused, violating digital evidence chain-of-custody protocols.
Misuse of Investigative Power for Recovery: The IO acted as a "recovery agent" by coercing third parties (Real Estate Builders, Family Members, and Landlords) to refund payments made prior to the alleged date of crime (25/07/2025) directly to the complainant, bypassing the Trial Court's proper adjudication.
Non-Disclosure of Material Evidence: Failure to report the recovery of specific gold ornaments, cash (Rs 35,000), and a DD of Rs 8.1 Lakhs in the final Charge Sheet.
Violation of the Right to Legal Representation & Party-in-Person: The JFMC’s refusal to allow the petitioner to argue as a Party-in-Person despite the petitioner’s educational background and the language barrier (Marathi/Hindi).
Scope of Work:
Drafting the Main Writ Petition: Including Statement of Facts, Chronology of Events, and Grounds for Interim Relief.
Drafting Interlocutory Applications (IAs): For the release of seized vehicles (2 cars), unfreezing of bank accounts, and stay on Trial Court proceedings pending the Writ.
Drafting the Party-in-Person Application: To be filed as per the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules.
Legal Research: Citing relevant Supreme Court and Bombay High Court precedents regarding "Illegal Recovery by IO" and "Falsification of Arrest Records."
Requirements for the Freelancer:
Proven track record in drafting Criminal Writs for the Bombay High Court.
Deep understanding of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) 2023 and Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) 2023.
Ability to organize a voluminous amount of factual data into a concise, hard-hitting legal argument.
Fluency in English (the petition must be in English).
Project Description:
I am seeking an expert legal researcher and drafter with extensive experience in Indian Criminal Law and High Court Writ Jurisdiction. I require the drafting of a Writ Petition to be filed before the Hon’ble Bombay High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and/or Section 528 of BNSS 2023 (formerly Section 482 CrPC).
The petitioner is a PhD holder and a former UPSC aspirant who intends to appear as a Party-in-Person. The petition will challenge the illegalities in the investigation of FIR No. 96/2025 (Cyber Crime Police Station, Pune) involving sections 318(4), 319(2) of BNS 2023, and Section 66(D) of the IT Act.
Key Grounds to be Covered in the Petition:
Violation of Arrest Procedures: The arrest occurred on 20/09/2025 at 03:00 PM, yet the Charge Sheet falsely records it as 21/09/2025 at 03:15 AM. This is a direct violation of D.K. Basu v. State of West Bengal and Section 35 of BNSS.
Custodial Torture & Human Rights Violations: Evidence of physical abuse and the use of electric shocks during custody at the Pune Cyber Crime PS, including the deliberate switching off of CCTV cameras.
Procedural Illegalities in Search & Seizure: Contradictory timings in the House Search/Seizure forms. Unauthorized access to seized gadgets by a "third-party expert" without the presence of the accused, violating digital evidence chain-of-custody protocols.
Misuse of Investigative Power for Recovery: The IO acted as a "recovery agent" by coercing third parties (Real Estate Builders, Family Members, and Landlords) to refund payments made prior to the alleged date of crime (25/07/2025) directly to the complainant, bypassing the Trial Court's proper adjudication.
Non-Disclosure of Material Evidence: Failure to report the recovery of specific gold ornaments, cash (Rs 35,000), and a DD of Rs 8.1 Lakhs in the final Charge Sheet.
Violation of the Right to Legal Representation & Party-in-Person: The JFMC’s refusal to allow the petitioner to argue as a Party-in-Person despite the petitioner’s educational background and the language barrier (Marathi/Hindi).
Scope of Work:
Drafting the Main Writ Petition: Including Statement of Facts, Chronology of Events, and Grounds for Interim Relief.
Drafting Interlocutory Applications (IAs): For the release of seized vehicles (2 cars), unfreezing of bank accounts, and stay on Trial Court proceedings pending the Writ.
Drafting the Party-in-Person Application: To be filed as per the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules.
Legal Research: Citing relevant Supreme Court and Bombay High Court precedents regarding "Illegal Recovery by IO" and "Falsification of Arrest Records."
Requirements for the Freelancer:
Proven track record in drafting Criminal Writs for the Bombay High Court.
Deep understanding of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) 2023 and Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) 2023.
Ability to organize a voluminous amount of factual data into a concise, hard-hitting legal argument.
Fluency in English (the petition must be in English).
Related categories:
Legal
Legal Research
Research Writing
Patents
Legal Writing
Criminal Law
Legal Analysis
Legal Consultation