Motion to Reconsider Filing Help
Budget: $30 – $250 USD
I have drafted a motion asking Superior Court to reconsider a recent small-claims judgment, arguing that the trial court misinterpreted the law. My deadline is only a couple of days away, so I need rapid, precise guidance.
The core of the brief is already written, but I want an attorney or experienced paralegal to:
• Review the substance for legal sufficiency on the “misinterpretation of the law” ground.
• Re-format the motion so it fully complies with Superior Court rules (caption, line spacing, signature block, exhibits).
• Advise on—and document—the correct service and notice procedure, including any proof-of-service forms, so I can file and serve without rejection.
Turnaround: first pass within 24 hours, final version well before the filing cutoff.
I found 2 cases that support my position that I did not cite in the original case although, at the hearing my position was that Lefebvre towed the car without authorization, Team Nissan's failure to follow procedure by notifying the police to report the vehicle as abandoned prevents Lefebvre from using the abandoned vehicle law as basis to tow the car. Additionally, the Appeal of TradZ makes clear the purpose of the Abandoned Vehicle Law is to provide a way for companies that provided a service to be reimbursed. The mechanism referenced is selling the vehicle it says nothing about collaborating with a third party to sue the vehicle owner. Team Nissan never sought a mechanics lien on the vehicle which allows the same mechanism to be used as the abandoned vehicle law. Repair shops can recover funds by auctioning the vehicle. Again there is no mention of suing the customer for third party storage costs initiated 7 months after the car was brought for repair.
The core of the brief is already written, but I want an attorney or experienced paralegal to:
• Review the substance for legal sufficiency on the “misinterpretation of the law” ground.
• Re-format the motion so it fully complies with Superior Court rules (caption, line spacing, signature block, exhibits).
• Advise on—and document—the correct service and notice procedure, including any proof-of-service forms, so I can file and serve without rejection.
Turnaround: first pass within 24 hours, final version well before the filing cutoff.
I found 2 cases that support my position that I did not cite in the original case although, at the hearing my position was that Lefebvre towed the car without authorization, Team Nissan's failure to follow procedure by notifying the police to report the vehicle as abandoned prevents Lefebvre from using the abandoned vehicle law as basis to tow the car. Additionally, the Appeal of TradZ makes clear the purpose of the Abandoned Vehicle Law is to provide a way for companies that provided a service to be reimbursed. The mechanism referenced is selling the vehicle it says nothing about collaborating with a third party to sue the vehicle owner. Team Nissan never sought a mechanics lien on the vehicle which allows the same mechanism to be used as the abandoned vehicle law. Repair shops can recover funds by auctioning the vehicle. Again there is no mention of suing the customer for third party storage costs initiated 7 months after the car was brought for repair.