Libel Report, possible $99,000
Budget: £10 – £20 GBP
I need a libel report for my 12-min play. You will identify any defamatory statements and ensure that when Mishcon de Reya’s (Princess Di’s, now Guinness World Records’, lawyers) tell internet providers to remove the play, Mishcon are safely ignorable.
Before you read on, the budget was zero so I've had to re-upload and make it the minimum of £10. But the potential is double the largest option (double the $50,000) I could've clicked.
You, with an impressive-to-Western-audience legal label, can 'copy' - for all I care - my Libel Report (see pdf). The report is simply-written, highly-researched, covers (I think) all points, and reaches a natural conclusion. It even looks good on the big-font, two-page pdf. The problem is, I am a nobody. You need to be either a libel lawyer yourself or be part of a team - wherever you are - ALSO based in either UK or US. So, when I put the play on guinnessworldrecords.org (they have .com & .uk) & on YouTube & crapcases.com (I've got other plays when ready about other rotten orgs) the internet provider can say: "No, it stays up. We see it's all true from the start of the court case (Amended Particulars enc.). And here’s an official libel report.”
Mishcon / Guinness will say: "It's all fiction. Take it down."
YouTube etc can then say: "Sure, we're both 100% correct. But it’s such a true fiction, a precise parallel, an accurate analogy that it is indisputably fair comment / fair opinion."
Guinness, fearing others joining me, fearing a blemish on their pristine reputation, will settle. I'll give 10% of the 500K - 990K (in Amended Particulars) that I think they’ll pay. Wouldn't you? I can already prove they're terrified of this play… They made a massive fuss about a petty, irrelevant thing from 9 years ago (even fabricating a letter to call me “vexatious”) that judges ignored. Yet the play -- painting them as monsters – was offered three times by me in writing, and many more times verbally, in court. And they always studiously ignored it.
Unless you already know of one, don't waste time looking for something similar to mine. Probably doesn't exist. The play is not a biopic. I've spent months looking around, & spoken to top libel lawyers in the UK who've never heard of this sort of thing either.
All you need do is
1. Ask for my short play, hopefully laugh, enjoy it, and be incredulous (that’s why the Timeline of Lies will be on YouTube too) to verify the accuracy of the analogy.
2. Tell me that that Guinness might be able to claim xyz is defamatory, or it's at least debatable. If you can see smthg, great, well done, we'll discuss, I'll correct.
3. Put my libel report in your own legalistic words -- while hopefully adding smthg(s) I've missed -- with your company & personal credentials to impress Mishcon, Guinness, YouTube, Fasthosts, Go Daddy, etc.
4. Pick up 100K!
I'm UK-based, but Guinness & YouTube etc are worldwide. And Guinness will want this to go away ... as I wanted to make them act fairly, not knowing that fraud must be part of their business model. (Libel Rpt, penultimate para.)
ONLY look at 'Introduction' & 'Timeline of Lies' of the enc Amended Particulars. I lost the case as I sued on fraudulent misrepresentation and (just thinking it meant Guinness did not live by the spirit of the law) failed to show that they approached me initially (fraudulent misrep’s first ‘element’). Obviously, Guinness never approach you. They just wait for suckers to come along and pay their Priority fee. (Check their website.) Also, English lawyers didn't want a cut, demanding £3-5K to see the whole case. Pointless. You’re most welcome to see it all for your £10, but the play is only about the Amended Particulars – and only the start of that.
13 png screenshots may help you / helped me do my amateur libel report.
Before you read on, the budget was zero so I've had to re-upload and make it the minimum of £10. But the potential is double the largest option (double the $50,000) I could've clicked.
You, with an impressive-to-Western-audience legal label, can 'copy' - for all I care - my Libel Report (see pdf). The report is simply-written, highly-researched, covers (I think) all points, and reaches a natural conclusion. It even looks good on the big-font, two-page pdf. The problem is, I am a nobody. You need to be either a libel lawyer yourself or be part of a team - wherever you are - ALSO based in either UK or US. So, when I put the play on guinnessworldrecords.org (they have .com & .uk) & on YouTube & crapcases.com (I've got other plays when ready about other rotten orgs) the internet provider can say: "No, it stays up. We see it's all true from the start of the court case (Amended Particulars enc.). And here’s an official libel report.”
Mishcon / Guinness will say: "It's all fiction. Take it down."
YouTube etc can then say: "Sure, we're both 100% correct. But it’s such a true fiction, a precise parallel, an accurate analogy that it is indisputably fair comment / fair opinion."
Guinness, fearing others joining me, fearing a blemish on their pristine reputation, will settle. I'll give 10% of the 500K - 990K (in Amended Particulars) that I think they’ll pay. Wouldn't you? I can already prove they're terrified of this play… They made a massive fuss about a petty, irrelevant thing from 9 years ago (even fabricating a letter to call me “vexatious”) that judges ignored. Yet the play -- painting them as monsters – was offered three times by me in writing, and many more times verbally, in court. And they always studiously ignored it.
Unless you already know of one, don't waste time looking for something similar to mine. Probably doesn't exist. The play is not a biopic. I've spent months looking around, & spoken to top libel lawyers in the UK who've never heard of this sort of thing either.
All you need do is
1. Ask for my short play, hopefully laugh, enjoy it, and be incredulous (that’s why the Timeline of Lies will be on YouTube too) to verify the accuracy of the analogy.
2. Tell me that that Guinness might be able to claim xyz is defamatory, or it's at least debatable. If you can see smthg, great, well done, we'll discuss, I'll correct.
3. Put my libel report in your own legalistic words -- while hopefully adding smthg(s) I've missed -- with your company & personal credentials to impress Mishcon, Guinness, YouTube, Fasthosts, Go Daddy, etc.
4. Pick up 100K!
I'm UK-based, but Guinness & YouTube etc are worldwide. And Guinness will want this to go away ... as I wanted to make them act fairly, not knowing that fraud must be part of their business model. (Libel Rpt, penultimate para.)
ONLY look at 'Introduction' & 'Timeline of Lies' of the enc Amended Particulars. I lost the case as I sued on fraudulent misrepresentation and (just thinking it meant Guinness did not live by the spirit of the law) failed to show that they approached me initially (fraudulent misrep’s first ‘element’). Obviously, Guinness never approach you. They just wait for suckers to come along and pay their Priority fee. (Check their website.) Also, English lawyers didn't want a cut, demanding £3-5K to see the whole case. Pointless. You’re most welcome to see it all for your £10, but the play is only about the Amended Particulars – and only the start of that.
13 png screenshots may help you / helped me do my amateur libel report.