Need Journalists to expose Ezeugo v UK, dubbed by the UN as one of the worst miscarriages of justice), plus UK bribery of Serbian King's College University London Mateja Durovic in blocking 8063/25 in European Court of Human Rights & WHRC8764 in the UN
Budget: $1,500 – $3,000 USD
As per @grok's independent analysis and reasoned opinion, URGENT global exposure of this case is needed as a matter of urgency to expose the cover-up in the United Kingdom, the cover-up in the European Court of Human Rights. Read KB-2024-003927; Ezeugo v United Kingdom, undoubtedly Britain's Worst Scandal/Cover-up (dubbed by the United Nations as one of the worst racially-motivated miscarriages of justice).
The UK Government bribery of (Serbian) King's College University London Mateja Durovic who also worked for the United Nations, European Commission to block case 8063/25 in European Court of Human Rights & WHRC8764 in the United Nations Geneva is of the gravest concern.
It remains unexplained how Mateja Durovic was suddenly elected as judge in the European Court of Human Rights just as I gave notice to the UK government and Judiciary of my intention to make applications to the European Court of Human Rights and the United Nations in what is truly harrowing and perpetual human rights violation of the worst kind.
What part did the UK government and judiciary play in ensuring Mateja Durovic in order to use him to block these cases which by the admissions of all the UK judges including the most senior and their lawyers the UK government stands no chance of winning and the evidence will cause considerable damage to the UK government, the judiciary and very high ranking officials?
There is a fierce urgency to the situation. The President of the European Court of Human Rights has a duty to re-open case 8360/25 in the light of the revelations in my letters below which exposed Mateja Durovic who blocked the case as agent of the UK government. But to date despite having visited the ECHR in Strasbourg 6 times and despite having served these letters to the President of the ECHR and confirmation that they're delivered to him, he has not even responded or re-opened the case. And the obstructions of justice in blocking the case and the deliberate failures by the so called President are due to lack of publicity. Members of the public are completely unaware of this case, hence they've been getting away with these flagrant gross abuses. So, we need to take all necessary steps to expose this case through all avenues in order to ensure that the President of the ECHR must carryout his duty and re-open the case which the UK government evidently used Mateja Durovic to block.
And we also need to ensure transparency in WHRC8764 in the United Nations in Geneva, The Working Group are due to meet for that case this December. And unless exposed UK government and Mateja will block it from hearing also.
Every rational senior and appellant judge in the UK including 2 former Chief Justices (John Thomas and Ian Burnett) and a long list of senior and appellant judges like Sedley, Ward, Anthony May Pitchford, LJJJJ, Jack, Langstaff, Collins, Butcher JJJJ etc found this is unprecedented and extremely serious case of considerable public importance and that it must be heard. Every lawyer involved in this case found it to be an unprecedented case of global public importance and that it's in the public interest that it must be heard just as the judges found.
The UK Government bribery of (Serbian) King's College University London Mateja Durovic who also worked for the United Nations, European Commission to block case 8063/25 in European Court of Human Rights & WHRC8764 in the United Nations Geneva is of the gravest concern.
It remains unexplained how Mateja Durovic was suddenly elected as judge in the European Court of Human Rights just as I gave notice to the UK government and Judiciary of my intention to make applications to the European Court of Human Rights and the United Nations in what is truly harrowing and perpetual human rights violation of the worst kind.
What part did the UK government and judiciary play in ensuring Mateja Durovic in order to use him to block these cases which by the admissions of all the UK judges including the most senior and their lawyers the UK government stands no chance of winning and the evidence will cause considerable damage to the UK government, the judiciary and very high ranking officials?
There is a fierce urgency to the situation. The President of the European Court of Human Rights has a duty to re-open case 8360/25 in the light of the revelations in my letters below which exposed Mateja Durovic who blocked the case as agent of the UK government. But to date despite having visited the ECHR in Strasbourg 6 times and despite having served these letters to the President of the ECHR and confirmation that they're delivered to him, he has not even responded or re-opened the case. And the obstructions of justice in blocking the case and the deliberate failures by the so called President are due to lack of publicity. Members of the public are completely unaware of this case, hence they've been getting away with these flagrant gross abuses. So, we need to take all necessary steps to expose this case through all avenues in order to ensure that the President of the ECHR must carryout his duty and re-open the case which the UK government evidently used Mateja Durovic to block.
And we also need to ensure transparency in WHRC8764 in the United Nations in Geneva, The Working Group are due to meet for that case this December. And unless exposed UK government and Mateja will block it from hearing also.
Every rational senior and appellant judge in the UK including 2 former Chief Justices (John Thomas and Ian Burnett) and a long list of senior and appellant judges like Sedley, Ward, Anthony May Pitchford, LJJJJ, Jack, Langstaff, Collins, Butcher JJJJ etc found this is unprecedented and extremely serious case of considerable public importance and that it must be heard. Every lawyer involved in this case found it to be an unprecedented case of global public importance and that it's in the public interest that it must be heard just as the judges found.