Digital Map Accuracy Evaluation
Budget: $250 – $750 AUD
I need an experienced Tryrating.com evaluator to review a set of digital maps and deliver a clear, professional assessment of their data accuracy. Your background with rating companies should allow you to spot inconsistencies in geolocation points, missing or outdated place information, and any mismatched routing data quickly and methodically.
Scope of work
• Access the maps through the credentials I will supply.
• Work through the assigned regions and layers, checking real-world coordinates, place names, road networks, POI metadata, and address details against reliable public sources.
• Document every inaccuracy and rank its severity, providing a brief explanation and a suggested fix where possible.
Deliverable
A concise evaluation report (spreadsheet or Google Sheet is fine) that lists:
– Location or tile reference
– Type of error
– Evidence/source used for verification
– Recommended correction
Acceptance criteria
1. At least 95 % of the provided tiles must be covered.
2. All findings must include a verifiable public source link or screenshot.
3. No placeholder comments—every row should be actionable.
Timeline & communication
The first batch will be 100 map tiles; I expect the completed report within five days of assignment. I’m available for questions on Slack or email and will review your first 10 entries to ensure we’re aligned before you proceed with the rest.
If you can deliver precise, source-backed accuracy audits, I’d love to hear how you plan to tackle the task and the tools you typically lean on (OpenStreetMap, Google Earth, GIS suites, etc.).
Scope of work
• Access the maps through the credentials I will supply.
• Work through the assigned regions and layers, checking real-world coordinates, place names, road networks, POI metadata, and address details against reliable public sources.
• Document every inaccuracy and rank its severity, providing a brief explanation and a suggested fix where possible.
Deliverable
A concise evaluation report (spreadsheet or Google Sheet is fine) that lists:
– Location or tile reference
– Type of error
– Evidence/source used for verification
– Recommended correction
Acceptance criteria
1. At least 95 % of the provided tiles must be covered.
2. All findings must include a verifiable public source link or screenshot.
3. No placeholder comments—every row should be actionable.
Timeline & communication
The first batch will be 100 map tiles; I expect the completed report within five days of assignment. I’m available for questions on Slack or email and will review your first 10 entries to ensure we’re aligned before you proceed with the rest.
If you can deliver precise, source-backed accuracy audits, I’d love to hear how you plan to tackle the task and the tools you typically lean on (OpenStreetMap, Google Earth, GIS suites, etc.).