Systematic Review on Ecosystem Services
Budget: ₹1,000 – ₹5,000 INR
I am preparing a journal-ready systematic literature review that maps the full breadth of research on ecosystem services (assessment and valuation). The review must encompass provisioning, regulating and cultural services, examining every major angle—from biodiversity and climate regulation to food production and beyond.
Here is what I need from you:
• A transparent, PRISMA-compliant search strategy covering core databases such as Web of Science, Scopus and Google Scholar.
• Clearly documented inclusion/exclusion criteria and a flow diagram that tracks the screening process end-to-end.
• A quality appraisal matrix rating each study.
• Structured data extraction tables summarising study design, geographic focus, service category and key findings.
• A narrative synthesis (and meta-analysis where feasible) that highlights evidence trends, knowledge gaps and future research directions.
• Draft manuscript text, formatted to the guidelines of a reputable peer-reviewed journal in the environmental sciences, complete with figures, tables and reference list (preferably in EndNote or Zotero format).
Acceptance criteria
1. All steps, decisions and collected data are reproducible from the supplied documentation.
2. The writing is publication-ready—clear, concise and referenced in the journal’s required style.
3. Deliverables are submitted in editable formats (Word and Excel/CSV) plus PDFs for figures/flowchart.
If you have a strong track record in environmental science reviews and are comfortable navigating large bodies of literature, let’s collaborate to produce a paper that advances the field.
Here is what I need from you:
• A transparent, PRISMA-compliant search strategy covering core databases such as Web of Science, Scopus and Google Scholar.
• Clearly documented inclusion/exclusion criteria and a flow diagram that tracks the screening process end-to-end.
• A quality appraisal matrix rating each study.
• Structured data extraction tables summarising study design, geographic focus, service category and key findings.
• A narrative synthesis (and meta-analysis where feasible) that highlights evidence trends, knowledge gaps and future research directions.
• Draft manuscript text, formatted to the guidelines of a reputable peer-reviewed journal in the environmental sciences, complete with figures, tables and reference list (preferably in EndNote or Zotero format).
Acceptance criteria
1. All steps, decisions and collected data are reproducible from the supplied documentation.
2. The writing is publication-ready—clear, concise and referenced in the journal’s required style.
3. Deliverables are submitted in editable formats (Word and Excel/CSV) plus PDFs for figures/flowchart.
If you have a strong track record in environmental science reviews and are comfortable navigating large bodies of literature, let’s collaborate to produce a paper that advances the field.