Medical Research Article Accuracy Review
Budget: $250 – $750 USD
I have a set of articles that translate recent medical research into language the general public can understand, and I need an experienced editor to make sure every claim, statistic, and reference is spot-on. Your primary task is to verify medical accuracy—cross-checking study designs, data interpretation, and cited sources—so readers can trust what they’re learning. While tidy grammar and consistent styling are always appreciated, the real value you’ll bring is a keen, evidence-based eye that can catch subtle misinterpretations or outdated information before publication.
Each piece averages 1,200–1,500 words, is already drafted in Google Docs, and includes links to the original studies (PubMed, clinical trial registries, or peer-reviewed journals). You’ll review the manuscript, flag any inaccuracies or unsupported statements, correct them directly when possible, and add concise reviewer notes where clarification from me is required.
The ideal workflow:
• Open the shared doc, track your changes, and add brief margin comments for complex revisions.
• Return the reviewed version within three days so I can address follow-ups quickly.
I’ll consider the job complete when every fact is properly sourced, terminology is explained clearly for lay readers, and the final document is ready to move into design without further scientific edits. If this sounds like the kind of precise, research-driven editing you enjoy, I look forward to collaborating.
Each piece averages 1,200–1,500 words, is already drafted in Google Docs, and includes links to the original studies (PubMed, clinical trial registries, or peer-reviewed journals). You’ll review the manuscript, flag any inaccuracies or unsupported statements, correct them directly when possible, and add concise reviewer notes where clarification from me is required.
The ideal workflow:
• Open the shared doc, track your changes, and add brief margin comments for complex revisions.
• Return the reviewed version within three days so I can address follow-ups quickly.
I’ll consider the job complete when every fact is properly sourced, terminology is explained clearly for lay readers, and the final document is ready to move into design without further scientific edits. If this sounds like the kind of precise, research-driven editing you enjoy, I look forward to collaborating.