Captive vs Grid Power Analysis

Job ID: 39961035

Budget: $250 – $750 USD

I need a thorough comparison of running our refinery on an in-house (captive) power plant versus relying on the national grid. The goal is to decide which option best supports long-term, sustainable operations.

Key focus areas
• Cost efficiency – build a clear life-cycle cost model that captures CAPEX, OPEX, fuel price scenarios, and potential tariff changes.
• Reliability – quantify expected downtime, N-1 contingencies, and the impact on refinery throughput and maintenance planning.
• Environmental impact – estimate greenhouse-gas emissions, water use, and any compliance penalties under local regulations.
• Self-reliance – assess strategic benefits such as energy security, control over maintenance windows, and resilience to grid instability.

What I expect
1. A written report that walks me through methodology, data sources, calculations, assumptions, and a concise executive summary.
2. Supporting spreadsheets or a Power BI/Excel model where I can tweak key variables and instantly see updated results.
3. Clear recommendations with pros, cons, risk profile, and a ranked decision matrix.
4. A brief call or recorded walkthrough so I can hand the work to senior management with confidence.

If you regularly work with refinery utilities, power-system economics, or sustainability reporting, your expertise will be invaluable.