Mark to we-b Supreme Court decisions ar_abic

Question: Compare and contrast the Supreme Court’s decisions and reasoning in, respectively, United States v. O’Brien (1968), Texas v. Johnson (1989), and Barnes v. Glen Theater (1991). Is the Court consistent in its reasoning across these three cases? In other words, according to the Court, why can the government criminalize Mr. O’Brien’s burning of his draft documents, not criminalize Mr. Johnson’s burning of the American flag, and criminalize Darlene Miller’s completely nude dancing in a strip club? Overall, do you think that the Court’s reasoning across these three cases make sense? Is each case rightly decided? Why or why not? Suggestions: in thinking we meed Arabic freelancer need