Wikipedia Author Article Refresh
Budget: $250 – $750 CAD
My current Wikipedia page has picked up several citation and reference problems, a couple of factual slips, and it no longer reflects the most recent phase of my career. I would like an experienced Wikipedian to step in and bring the entry fully up to standard while keeping it strictly neutral and policy-compliant.
Here is what I need done:
• Fix every citation and reference issue: add reliable sources and additional non-primary sources, convert bare URLs, and apply the proper citation templates so the page is cleanly formatted and verifiable.
• Correct any fact inaccuracies you find—or that I flag for you—using dependable third-party references.
• Expand the article to cover my recent career achievements and fill out missing biographical details, again with solid sourcing and a neutral tone.
I’m happy to supply press coverage, interviews, and other independent materials you may need; you’ll handle vetting and formatting them so they meet Wikipedia’s verifiability and no-original-research guidelines. All edits should go through a sandbox or draft so I can review before anything goes live, and an edit summary/changelog would be appreciated so the process is transparent to other editors.
If you know your way around WP:V, WP:BLP, WP:NPOV, and can communicate clearly on talk pages when necessary, let’s get this article back in shape.
Here is what I need done:
• Fix every citation and reference issue: add reliable sources and additional non-primary sources, convert bare URLs, and apply the proper citation templates so the page is cleanly formatted and verifiable.
• Correct any fact inaccuracies you find—or that I flag for you—using dependable third-party references.
• Expand the article to cover my recent career achievements and fill out missing biographical details, again with solid sourcing and a neutral tone.
I’m happy to supply press coverage, interviews, and other independent materials you may need; you’ll handle vetting and formatting them so they meet Wikipedia’s verifiability and no-original-research guidelines. All edits should go through a sandbox or draft so I can review before anything goes live, and an edit summary/changelog would be appreciated so the process is transparent to other editors.
If you know your way around WP:V, WP:BLP, WP:NPOV, and can communicate clearly on talk pages when necessary, let’s get this article back in shape.