Computer Science Questionnaire Review only for someone with phd degree
Budget: $2 – $8 USD
I have drafted a short questionnaire on language processing, zeroing in on semantic phenomena, and I want a fresh pair of highly trained eyes to stress-test it before it goes out to participants. Your task is to read through each item, flag ambiguities or leading wording, and suggest improvements that keep the questions scientifically grounded yet understandable to non-experts.
What matters most to me is that every prompt accurately targets semantics—no drift into syntax or general usability. Please comment on phrasing, ordering, scale choices, and any potential bias. I welcome inline markup (Word’s Track Changes or Google Docs comments) plus a concise summary explaining your rationale for major edits. If you spot gaps where additional semantic probes would strengthen validity, feel free to propose them.
I would like the annotated document and the summary memo returned within two days of project start so I can iterate quickly. Familiarity with standard semantic tasks and current computational linguistics literature will help you breeze through this.
What matters most to me is that every prompt accurately targets semantics—no drift into syntax or general usability. Please comment on phrasing, ordering, scale choices, and any potential bias. I welcome inline markup (Word’s Track Changes or Google Docs comments) plus a concise summary explaining your rationale for major edits. If you spot gaps where additional semantic probes would strengthen validity, feel free to propose them.
I would like the annotated document and the summary memo returned within two days of project start so I can iterate quickly. Familiarity with standard semantic tasks and current computational linguistics literature will help you breeze through this.