Evaluating Carbon Sequestration Method
Budget: $25 – $50 USD
I have developed a novel method of carbon sequestration. If the method is valid, it would be able to profitably sequester gigatonnes of CO2. I realize this is saying a lot. In my opinion, evaluating the chemistry “on paper” is the first step of validation. I've reached the upper limits of my abilities and I can't see why this wouldn't work at least on paper. Perhaps there is some big glaring thing I'm missing.
I’m looking for people to validate/invalidate the process – and if it seems promising, to approach it with a collaborate mind, “I see what you’re trying to do, but here’s a better idea…”. This is not like traditional peer review, but it's about seeing if there's a path forward with this method.
I have explained my process in a paper and I have several chemical process diagrams explaining it. The project would be to read the paper and to review the chemistry and math of it and share your opinion. First and foremost, I'm looking to see if there's some big glaring thing that I'm missing here. If there isn't anything, then we could move forward toward more precise validation and finalizing the math and chemistry of it all.
Thank you for your time.
I’m looking for people to validate/invalidate the process – and if it seems promising, to approach it with a collaborate mind, “I see what you’re trying to do, but here’s a better idea…”. This is not like traditional peer review, but it's about seeing if there's a path forward with this method.
I have explained my process in a paper and I have several chemical process diagrams explaining it. The project would be to read the paper and to review the chemistry and math of it and share your opinion. First and foremost, I'm looking to see if there's some big glaring thing that I'm missing here. If there isn't anything, then we could move forward toward more precise validation and finalizing the math and chemistry of it all.
Thank you for your time.