read 3 IT software research articles (6-10 page per each) and make a 3 pages document to summarize them as below( master degree IT research work)
Budget: $30 – $250 CAD
read 3 IT software reasearch articles (6-10 page per each) and make a 3 pages document to summarize them following the document
articles are in english, the work to do in french but also english is ok , I can translate the output to french
our final submission is a 2-3 page overview (single spaced, i.e. no spaces between lines, 10 point font), not including figures and your list of references. The minimum is 2 full pages and the maximum is 3 pages.
Here is the desired structure of your flyover:
** header **
No cover page. Your name, the date, the course acronym ("MGL 835"), and a title indicating the topic of your overview at the top of the first page.
**Introduction**
A section explaining the chosen theme in 1 to 5 sentences. What connects the three selected articles? Why did you choose this theme and these articles?
** Summary of articles **
One section per article, which summarizes the article. You can limit yourself to the ideas presented in the article and not add your own ideas to them.
Present the problem targeted by the article, the solutions proposed in the article, how the solutions have been pursued (are there any interesting technical details?), And the validations or evaluations that have taken place. What are the results or
main recommendations? According to the authors of the article, what would be the next steps to follow up the work of the article? You can include figures from the articles, always citing the source.
4
Some articles cannot be summarized with the elements listed above, such as the articles themselves presenting overviews, taxonomies, or theories. In this case, present the main ideas of the article.
**Discussion**
A section taking a step back from the articles, where you present your own analysis of the work. You can contrast the works discussed, to compare their strengths and weaknesses. You can analyze or compare the works according to different
criteria or dimensions of your choice that you find relevant.
It is sometimes possible to classify jobs, systems, techniques, etc. in a taxonomy. Taxonomies can be useful for summarizing the big picture. If you find a taxonomy of your subject in one of your references1, or if you are able to create one, it would be very good to present it here. However, it can be difficult to create a taxonomy for some subjects. You therefore have no obligation to establish a
taxonomy for your subject. See the appendix for examples of taxonomies.
** Future work **
A section discussing future work that you find most relevant or interesting to pursue. If you have your own ideas for future steps for each article, present them here. Also, try to take a step back from the three selected items.
Think about your theme in a global way: What are the biggest challenges of your theme? Which were defeated? Which still remain unresolved? Do you have any ideas for strategies to solve them? It is even better if you can give a reason why you think one strategy would be better than another.
Reference list
This list should contain at least the three items you have chosen. You can add other articles, books, websites, or videos to this list of references so that you can cite them in your text. See the appendix for more information on the reference list.
articles are in english, the work to do in french but also english is ok , I can translate the output to french
our final submission is a 2-3 page overview (single spaced, i.e. no spaces between lines, 10 point font), not including figures and your list of references. The minimum is 2 full pages and the maximum is 3 pages.
Here is the desired structure of your flyover:
** header **
No cover page. Your name, the date, the course acronym ("MGL 835"), and a title indicating the topic of your overview at the top of the first page.
**Introduction**
A section explaining the chosen theme in 1 to 5 sentences. What connects the three selected articles? Why did you choose this theme and these articles?
** Summary of articles **
One section per article, which summarizes the article. You can limit yourself to the ideas presented in the article and not add your own ideas to them.
Present the problem targeted by the article, the solutions proposed in the article, how the solutions have been pursued (are there any interesting technical details?), And the validations or evaluations that have taken place. What are the results or
main recommendations? According to the authors of the article, what would be the next steps to follow up the work of the article? You can include figures from the articles, always citing the source.
4
Some articles cannot be summarized with the elements listed above, such as the articles themselves presenting overviews, taxonomies, or theories. In this case, present the main ideas of the article.
**Discussion**
A section taking a step back from the articles, where you present your own analysis of the work. You can contrast the works discussed, to compare their strengths and weaknesses. You can analyze or compare the works according to different
criteria or dimensions of your choice that you find relevant.
It is sometimes possible to classify jobs, systems, techniques, etc. in a taxonomy. Taxonomies can be useful for summarizing the big picture. If you find a taxonomy of your subject in one of your references1, or if you are able to create one, it would be very good to present it here. However, it can be difficult to create a taxonomy for some subjects. You therefore have no obligation to establish a
taxonomy for your subject. See the appendix for examples of taxonomies.
** Future work **
A section discussing future work that you find most relevant or interesting to pursue. If you have your own ideas for future steps for each article, present them here. Also, try to take a step back from the three selected items.
Think about your theme in a global way: What are the biggest challenges of your theme? Which were defeated? Which still remain unresolved? Do you have any ideas for strategies to solve them? It is even better if you can give a reason why you think one strategy would be better than another.
Reference list
This list should contain at least the three items you have chosen. You can add other articles, books, websites, or videos to this list of references so that you can cite them in your text. See the appendix for more information on the reference list.