Professional Ski Cross Wikipedia Page
Budget: $750 – $1,500 USD
I need a polished, fully-referenced Wikipedia article drafted for a professional ski-cross athlete. The finished page must meet all of Wikipedia’s notability and verifiability guidelines, read naturally in encyclopedic tone, and be ready for submission without triggering conflict-of-interest or promotional flags.
Content focus
• Career achievements – World Cup podiums, championship results, rankings, awards and any notable records.
• Biographical details – early life, training background, national team involvement, education and relevant personal milestones that help demonstrate notability.
What I will supply
I can provide press clippings, links to FIS statistics and a résumé. You will still need to locate independent, secondary sources (reputable news outlets, governing-body publications, databases) to satisfy citation requirements.
Deliverables
1. Draft article in Wiki markup (sandbox-ready).
2. Full citation list in Wiki format with at least eight independent sources.
3. Brief summary of any potential notability gaps or issues.
Acceptance criteria
• Passes the Wikipedia Draft Check tool with no major errors.
• Neutral, third-person prose; no weasel words.
• All claims backed by inline citations from reliable, verifiable outlets.
If you already contribute to Wikipedia or have pages that survived AfD, mention them; it will help me decide quickly.
Content focus
• Career achievements – World Cup podiums, championship results, rankings, awards and any notable records.
• Biographical details – early life, training background, national team involvement, education and relevant personal milestones that help demonstrate notability.
What I will supply
I can provide press clippings, links to FIS statistics and a résumé. You will still need to locate independent, secondary sources (reputable news outlets, governing-body publications, databases) to satisfy citation requirements.
Deliverables
1. Draft article in Wiki markup (sandbox-ready).
2. Full citation list in Wiki format with at least eight independent sources.
3. Brief summary of any potential notability gaps or issues.
Acceptance criteria
• Passes the Wikipedia Draft Check tool with no major errors.
• Neutral, third-person prose; no weasel words.
• All claims backed by inline citations from reliable, verifiable outlets.
If you already contribute to Wikipedia or have pages that survived AfD, mention them; it will help me decide quickly.