Next.js AI Compliance Platform
Budget: €250 – €750 EUR
# AI Data Provenance & Compliance Platform
## Overview
We are building a digital provenance platform focused on AI training data compliance.
The platform enables organizations to:
* Track the origin of datasets used in AI systems
* Verify licensing and usage rights
* Maintain an immutable audit trail of data usage
* Generate compliance-ready reports for regulators (e.g. EU AI Act)
This is not a general-purpose ML platform—it is a compliance and provenance layer for AI systems.
---
## Core Scope (MVP → Already Implemented)
The system must:
* Maintain a dataset registry with metadata (source, license, owner)
* Automatically assign risk levels and compliance signals
* Track relationships between datasets and AI models
* Record audit logs for every action
* Generate compliance reports (PDF, CSV, JSON)
All data is:
* organization-scoped (multi-tenant)
* traceable across its lifecycle
---
## Extended Scope (Product Differentiation)
The platform evolves into a provenance engine by:
* Capturing every data interaction
* dataset creation
* linking to models
* report generation
* Providing explainable compliance decisions
* why a dataset is risky
* what rules triggered it
* Enabling lineage reconstruction
* “which datasets trained this model?”
* “what risks exist in this pipeline?”
---
## Architecture
### Frontend
* Next.js (App Router)
* TypeScript
* Tailwind CSS
* Dashboard-focused UX:
* Compliance score
* Dataset registry
* Model mapping
* Report viewer
* Audit logs
---
### Backend
* Node.js + Express (TypeScript)
* PostgreSQL + Prisma
* MinIO (S3-compatible) for report storage
Responsibilities:
* CRUD + validation
* Risk engine
* Audit logging
* Report generation
---
### Provenance Layer (Core Concept)
The system acts as a lightweight provenance ledger:
* Every action produces an audit event
* Events are:
* timestamped
* linked to users and entities
* queryable
This enables:
* reproducibility
* compliance verification
* forensic traceability
---
## AI / ML Integration (Future Phase)
The platform will expose:
* APIs to register:
* training runs
* inference events
* Logging for:
* which model used which dataset
* when and by whom
Goal:
Extend provenance from data to model to output
---
## Role-Based Access Control (Planned)
* Admin: full control
* Analyst: dataset and report access
* Viewer: read-only
RBAC enforced:
* in API
* in frontend UI
---
## Deliverables
* Next.js frontend dashboard
* Express API backend
* PostgreSQL schema (datasets, models, audit logs)
* S3-compatible storage for reports
* Compliance report generation (PDF/CSV)
---
## Acceptance Criteria
The platform is successful when:
* A user can:
* register datasets
* link them to models
* generate a compliance report
* The system can:
* flag risky datasets
* explain why
* show full audit trail
* A dataset’s lineage can be reconstructed in two clicks or fewer
---
## Vision
This evolves into:
A trust layer for AI systems, where every model can prove:
* what data it was trained on
* whether that data was compliant
* how it has been used
---
## Positioning
This is not:
* a model training platform
* a generic machine learning tool
This is:
AI data provenance and compliance infrastructure
## Overview
We are building a digital provenance platform focused on AI training data compliance.
The platform enables organizations to:
* Track the origin of datasets used in AI systems
* Verify licensing and usage rights
* Maintain an immutable audit trail of data usage
* Generate compliance-ready reports for regulators (e.g. EU AI Act)
This is not a general-purpose ML platform—it is a compliance and provenance layer for AI systems.
---
## Core Scope (MVP → Already Implemented)
The system must:
* Maintain a dataset registry with metadata (source, license, owner)
* Automatically assign risk levels and compliance signals
* Track relationships between datasets and AI models
* Record audit logs for every action
* Generate compliance reports (PDF, CSV, JSON)
All data is:
* organization-scoped (multi-tenant)
* traceable across its lifecycle
---
## Extended Scope (Product Differentiation)
The platform evolves into a provenance engine by:
* Capturing every data interaction
* dataset creation
* linking to models
* report generation
* Providing explainable compliance decisions
* why a dataset is risky
* what rules triggered it
* Enabling lineage reconstruction
* “which datasets trained this model?”
* “what risks exist in this pipeline?”
---
## Architecture
### Frontend
* Next.js (App Router)
* TypeScript
* Tailwind CSS
* Dashboard-focused UX:
* Compliance score
* Dataset registry
* Model mapping
* Report viewer
* Audit logs
---
### Backend
* Node.js + Express (TypeScript)
* PostgreSQL + Prisma
* MinIO (S3-compatible) for report storage
Responsibilities:
* CRUD + validation
* Risk engine
* Audit logging
* Report generation
---
### Provenance Layer (Core Concept)
The system acts as a lightweight provenance ledger:
* Every action produces an audit event
* Events are:
* timestamped
* linked to users and entities
* queryable
This enables:
* reproducibility
* compliance verification
* forensic traceability
---
## AI / ML Integration (Future Phase)
The platform will expose:
* APIs to register:
* training runs
* inference events
* Logging for:
* which model used which dataset
* when and by whom
Goal:
Extend provenance from data to model to output
---
## Role-Based Access Control (Planned)
* Admin: full control
* Analyst: dataset and report access
* Viewer: read-only
RBAC enforced:
* in API
* in frontend UI
---
## Deliverables
* Next.js frontend dashboard
* Express API backend
* PostgreSQL schema (datasets, models, audit logs)
* S3-compatible storage for reports
* Compliance report generation (PDF/CSV)
---
## Acceptance Criteria
The platform is successful when:
* A user can:
* register datasets
* link them to models
* generate a compliance report
* The system can:
* flag risky datasets
* explain why
* show full audit trail
* A dataset’s lineage can be reconstructed in two clicks or fewer
---
## Vision
This evolves into:
A trust layer for AI systems, where every model can prove:
* what data it was trained on
* whether that data was compliant
* how it has been used
---
## Positioning
This is not:
* a model training platform
* a generic machine learning tool
This is:
AI data provenance and compliance infrastructure