Wikipedia Entry for Airport STEM Projects
Budget: $250 – $750 USD
I need a well-sourced, neutral-tone Wikipedia article that documents the telecommunications, drone, and aerospace research I conduct at my small public airport and its antenna-testing range. The piece must speak to academics and researchers, so solid references, clear methodology summaries, and verifiable data matter more than marketing language.
Scope of work
• Draft an article outline that covers project background, research objectives, methodology, key findings, and important project completions to date.
• Write the full Wikipedia markup, including an infobox, section hierarchy, references list, and “Further reading” section.
• Integrate peer-reviewed papers, technical reports, flight-test logs, and any other reliable secondary sources I supply—plus additional third-party sources you locate to satisfy Wikipedia’s notability and verifiability policies.
• Maintain a balanced, encyclopedic tone that highlights research outcomes and findings rather than promotional claims.
• Prepare image suggestions or appropriately licensed visuals (e.g., drone flight photos, antenna-range diagrams) with captions and attribution details.
• Provide one revision round after Wikipedia community feedback or my internal review.
Acceptance criteria
– Article meets Wikipedia Manual of Style, citation, and notability guidelines.
– All claims are backed by inline citations from reliable, independent sources.
– Research outcomes and important completions are clearly presented in language accessible to specialist readers.
– Markup renders correctly in preview with no formatting errors or policy flags.
I will share unpublished data, photographs, and milestone summaries once we start; discretion and compliance with Wikipedia conflict-of-interest rules are expected.
Scope of work
• Draft an article outline that covers project background, research objectives, methodology, key findings, and important project completions to date.
• Write the full Wikipedia markup, including an infobox, section hierarchy, references list, and “Further reading” section.
• Integrate peer-reviewed papers, technical reports, flight-test logs, and any other reliable secondary sources I supply—plus additional third-party sources you locate to satisfy Wikipedia’s notability and verifiability policies.
• Maintain a balanced, encyclopedic tone that highlights research outcomes and findings rather than promotional claims.
• Prepare image suggestions or appropriately licensed visuals (e.g., drone flight photos, antenna-range diagrams) with captions and attribution details.
• Provide one revision round after Wikipedia community feedback or my internal review.
Acceptance criteria
– Article meets Wikipedia Manual of Style, citation, and notability guidelines.
– All claims are backed by inline citations from reliable, independent sources.
– Research outcomes and important completions are clearly presented in language accessible to specialist readers.
– Markup renders correctly in preview with no formatting errors or policy flags.
I will share unpublished data, photographs, and milestone summaries once we start; discretion and compliance with Wikipedia conflict-of-interest rules are expected.