10,000-Word Health Tech Implementation Review
Budget: £250 – £750 GBP
I am looking for a writer-researcher who can deliver a full 10,000-word systematic review suitable for a UK Master’s in Advanced Clinical Practice. The working topic is “Factors Influencing the Implementation of Technology in Healthcare,” with scope spanning digital tools, e-health platforms, medical devices and similar innovations that alter clinical workflows, patient pathways or organisational processes.
The manuscript must be structured exactly as: Problem Statement, Literature Review, Methodology, Conclusion. Within that frame I need:
• A clearly articulated problem statement that situates technology implementation within current NHS or comparable international contexts.
• A literature review that synthesises only primary research studies published in the last ten years; peer-reviewed journal articles should dominate, with grey literature used sparingly to close obvious evidence gaps.
• A transparent methodology section detailing database choices (e.g., MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase), search strings, inclusion/exclusion criteria, critical appraisal using a recognised tool such as CASP, a PRISMA flow diagram, and a concise data-extraction summary.
• A conclusion that links findings back to clinical practice and offers pragmatic recommendations for advanced practitioners and service leads.
Deliverables
1. 10,000-word manuscript in editable Word format, Harvard-referenced.
2. PRISMA flow diagram (PDF or PNG).
3. Data-extraction spreadsheet (Excel or CSV).
The tone must reflect postgraduate academic standards yet remain readable. Clarity, coherence and rigorous referencing are non-negotiable.
The manuscript must be structured exactly as: Problem Statement, Literature Review, Methodology, Conclusion. Within that frame I need:
• A clearly articulated problem statement that situates technology implementation within current NHS or comparable international contexts.
• A literature review that synthesises only primary research studies published in the last ten years; peer-reviewed journal articles should dominate, with grey literature used sparingly to close obvious evidence gaps.
• A transparent methodology section detailing database choices (e.g., MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase), search strings, inclusion/exclusion criteria, critical appraisal using a recognised tool such as CASP, a PRISMA flow diagram, and a concise data-extraction summary.
• A conclusion that links findings back to clinical practice and offers pragmatic recommendations for advanced practitioners and service leads.
Deliverables
1. 10,000-word manuscript in editable Word format, Harvard-referenced.
2. PRISMA flow diagram (PDF or PNG).
3. Data-extraction spreadsheet (Excel or CSV).
The tone must reflect postgraduate academic standards yet remain readable. Clarity, coherence and rigorous referencing are non-negotiable.