Meta-Analysis ADR Awareness Review
Budget: ₹1,500 – ₹12,500 INR
I am working on a Master’s-level university project that investigates how well patients recognize, report, and manage adverse drug reactions. I need two polished academic pieces:
• A 10-page literature review that doubles as a meta-analysis
– Follow PRISMA guidelines from search strategy to flow diagram
– Draw on recent, peer-reviewed studies (PubMed, Cochrane, Google Scholar, etc.)
– Include clear inclusion/exclusion criteria, forest plots, heterogeneity statistics, and a concise discussion of clinical implications
– Reference everything in APA 7 and keep tables and figures embedded in the manuscript
• A 20-slide PowerPoint that translates the paper into a clear visual story for an academic audience
– Aim for one slide per major section (background, methods, results, discussion, conclusions) plus title and reference slides
– Use readable charts and minimal text; the deck should stand on its own without narration
Both documents must meet the rigor expected at the Master’s level: coherent structure, critical appraisal of evidence, and error-free language. If you are comfortable synthesizing quantitative findings and presenting them visually, I would like to see a brief outline of your proposed approach before we begin.
• A 10-page literature review that doubles as a meta-analysis
– Follow PRISMA guidelines from search strategy to flow diagram
– Draw on recent, peer-reviewed studies (PubMed, Cochrane, Google Scholar, etc.)
– Include clear inclusion/exclusion criteria, forest plots, heterogeneity statistics, and a concise discussion of clinical implications
– Reference everything in APA 7 and keep tables and figures embedded in the manuscript
• A 20-slide PowerPoint that translates the paper into a clear visual story for an academic audience
– Aim for one slide per major section (background, methods, results, discussion, conclusions) plus title and reference slides
– Use readable charts and minimal text; the deck should stand on its own without narration
Both documents must meet the rigor expected at the Master’s level: coherent structure, critical appraisal of evidence, and error-free language. If you are comfortable synthesizing quantitative findings and presenting them visually, I would like to see a brief outline of your proposed approach before we begin.