SC-CO₂ HTD Mitigation Review
Budget: ₹12,500 – ₹37,500 INR
I’m preparing a full-length review article on mitigation strategies for heat-transfer deterioration (HTD) in super-critical CO₂ systems, aimed at a Q1 engineering journal. I already have the journal’s author guidelines and will pass them on at the outset, so the manuscript must follow their formatting, reference style and word-count limits precisely.
Scope of the paper
• Survey and critically compare all current HTD-mitigation techniques used in super-critical CO₂ flow systems (surface enhancement, flow manipulation, additives, operating-window optimisation, etc.).
• Draw exclusively on peer-reviewed scientific articles published in the last 10–12 years while highlighting any emerging concepts.
• Synthesise quantitative findings into clear tables and well-labelled plots (e.g., Nu vs. Re, pressure effects, additive concentration, CFD validation metrics). All figures must be publication-ready (vector format, 300 dpi).
• Discuss gaps, future research directions and practical implementation challenges, linking them back to engineering design practice.
Expectations & deliverables
1. Detailed outline for approval before drafting.
2. Complete manuscript (~8,000–10,000 words) written in a natural, human tone yet fully technical.
3. Minimum of five high-quality tables and ten original plots generated from collated data or CFD post-processing.
4. Turnitin report showing overall similarity below 12 %.
5. Cover letter tailored to the target journal plus a response-to-reviewers template to streamline submission.
6. Source files for text (Word/LaTeX), figures (e.g., .eps/.svg) and any CFD simulations.
Key skills you’ll need
• Proven record of publishing in Q1 engineering journals.
• Deep understanding of CFD applied to super-critical fluids; ability to extract and interpret simulation data where experimental data are scarce.
• Strong academic writing and referencing (EndNote, Mendeley or native LaTeX/BibTeX).
Acceptance criteria
The paper must pass my internal review for technical depth, meet every guideline item from the journal, and achieve the stated plagiarism threshold on Turnitin. Only submissions that satisfy these points will be considered complete.
Please include samples of similar review articles you have authored and briefly outline your approach to combining literature synthesis with CFD insight.
Scope of the paper
• Survey and critically compare all current HTD-mitigation techniques used in super-critical CO₂ flow systems (surface enhancement, flow manipulation, additives, operating-window optimisation, etc.).
• Draw exclusively on peer-reviewed scientific articles published in the last 10–12 years while highlighting any emerging concepts.
• Synthesise quantitative findings into clear tables and well-labelled plots (e.g., Nu vs. Re, pressure effects, additive concentration, CFD validation metrics). All figures must be publication-ready (vector format, 300 dpi).
• Discuss gaps, future research directions and practical implementation challenges, linking them back to engineering design practice.
Expectations & deliverables
1. Detailed outline for approval before drafting.
2. Complete manuscript (~8,000–10,000 words) written in a natural, human tone yet fully technical.
3. Minimum of five high-quality tables and ten original plots generated from collated data or CFD post-processing.
4. Turnitin report showing overall similarity below 12 %.
5. Cover letter tailored to the target journal plus a response-to-reviewers template to streamline submission.
6. Source files for text (Word/LaTeX), figures (e.g., .eps/.svg) and any CFD simulations.
Key skills you’ll need
• Proven record of publishing in Q1 engineering journals.
• Deep understanding of CFD applied to super-critical fluids; ability to extract and interpret simulation data where experimental data are scarce.
• Strong academic writing and referencing (EndNote, Mendeley or native LaTeX/BibTeX).
Acceptance criteria
The paper must pass my internal review for technical depth, meet every guideline item from the journal, and achieve the stated plagiarism threshold on Turnitin. Only submissions that satisfy these points will be considered complete.
Please include samples of similar review articles you have authored and briefly outline your approach to combining literature synthesis with CFD insight.