College-Level Subject Explanation Content
Budget: £10 – £15 GBP
I regularly compile tough questions that stump college students across the sciences, humanities, and social sciences. My goal is to turn each of those questions into a clear, engaging explanation that leaves the reader saying, “Now I get it.”
Here’s how I see the workflow. I supply a prompt—anything from quantum tunnelling to post-colonial theory or behavioural economics. You break the concept down, keep the academic accuracy intact, and rebuild it in plain language that still respects a university audience. Where diagrams, charts, equations, or historical context add value, feel free to weave them in; concise references to primary sources are welcome.
Deliverables (per topic)
• 500–700 words of written explanation in fluent English
• At least one real-world example or analogy that would resonate with an undergraduate
• A short list of key terms or equations, each with a one-sentence definition
• Citations or links (APA, MLA, or Chicago—your choice, just stay consistent)
Acceptance criteria
• No plagiarism; verifiable sources only
• Tone: conversational yet scholarly, never condescending
• Concepts must be traceable back to reputable academic material
• Submitted as an editable Google Doc or Word file
If you genuinely enjoy the art of explaining and can move comfortably between disciplines, this project will give you steady, varied work. Turnaround on each topic can be negotiated, but clarity and originality are non-negotiable.
Here’s how I see the workflow. I supply a prompt—anything from quantum tunnelling to post-colonial theory or behavioural economics. You break the concept down, keep the academic accuracy intact, and rebuild it in plain language that still respects a university audience. Where diagrams, charts, equations, or historical context add value, feel free to weave them in; concise references to primary sources are welcome.
Deliverables (per topic)
• 500–700 words of written explanation in fluent English
• At least one real-world example or analogy that would resonate with an undergraduate
• A short list of key terms or equations, each with a one-sentence definition
• Citations or links (APA, MLA, or Chicago—your choice, just stay consistent)
Acceptance criteria
• No plagiarism; verifiable sources only
• Tone: conversational yet scholarly, never condescending
• Concepts must be traceable back to reputable academic material
• Submitted as an editable Google Doc or Word file
If you genuinely enjoy the art of explaining and can move comfortably between disciplines, this project will give you steady, varied work. Turnaround on each topic can be negotiated, but clarity and originality are non-negotiable.