Academic Paper Review Expert
Budget: $30 – $250 USD
My draft academic paper is ready for polishing and a fresh set of human eyes. I need a meticulous review that corrects every grammatical slip, tightens syntax, and, just as importantly, flags any parts where the argument drifts, lacks evidence, or could be organised more clearly. The text must remain 100 % human-written throughout—please avoid AI rewriting tools; tracked, manual edits are essential.
What I will supply
• The current manuscript in Word (≈6,000 words)
• Any key references or data tables that support the discussion
What I’d like back
• A Word file with Track Changes on, showing every grammar, punctuation, and style adjustment
• Margin comments explaining conceptual suggestions—e.g., where a claim needs stronger linkage to cited work or a paragraph could be re-ordered for logic
• A short cover note (one page is fine) summarising the main issues you addressed and confirming the edit was performed manually
Feel free to rely on Grammarly, PerfectIt, MS Word Editor, or your own tried-and-true checklist to catch the mechanical errors, but the conceptual feedback must come from your expertise, not software. Turn-it-in or originality screens are welcome if you already have access, though not mandatory.
If this sounds like a straightforward evening’s work for you, let me know your turnaround time and a quick example of similar academic editing you’ve completed.
What I will supply
• The current manuscript in Word (≈6,000 words)
• Any key references or data tables that support the discussion
What I’d like back
• A Word file with Track Changes on, showing every grammar, punctuation, and style adjustment
• Margin comments explaining conceptual suggestions—e.g., where a claim needs stronger linkage to cited work or a paragraph could be re-ordered for logic
• A short cover note (one page is fine) summarising the main issues you addressed and confirming the edit was performed manually
Feel free to rely on Grammarly, PerfectIt, MS Word Editor, or your own tried-and-true checklist to catch the mechanical errors, but the conceptual feedback must come from your expertise, not software. Turn-it-in or originality screens are welcome if you already have access, though not mandatory.
If this sounds like a straightforward evening’s work for you, let me know your turnaround time and a quick example of similar academic editing you’ve completed.