Feasibility Schematic – Parking & Access on Sloped Site Overview -- 2
Budget: ₹12,500 – ₹37,500 INR
Parking & Access Site Layout - Auckland
We require a schematic feasibility layout (V1) for a steep site on a 809 sqm plot in Auckland.
The existing house will be converted into 6–7 therapy units, each with a separate entrance. The building footprint is fixed — your task is outside only: parking, circulation, access, and retaining feasibility.
This is a functional schematic only, not a polished render. We want a to-scale plan that tests how parking and circulation can realistically fit on a sloped lot.
Scope of Work
Create a to-scale, top-down schematic (DWG + PDF) showing:
Parking bays: NZ standard 2.5 m × 5.0 m (90° two-way default, but show if angled improves feasibility). Include 1 accessible bay near main entry.
Circulation: vehicle aisles, entry/exit from street, turning movements.
Pedestrian paths: safe, unobstructed routes from parking to unit entrances.
Slope / cut-fill: mark indicative retaining walls and approximate heights (bands: <1 m, 1–2 m, >2 m).
Services constraint: leave a corridor over the existing wastewater pipe (parking over pipe is acceptable; no building load).
Deliver two layout options with different parking arrangements.
Deliverables
Option A + Option B schematic: DWG + layered PDF at 1:200 or 1:250 scale.
Layers clearly separated: Boundary, Building, Parking, Aisles/Paths, Retaining, Pedestrian.
Dimensions on stalls and aisles.
Arrows for vehicle circulation.
Short notes/assumptions (stall sizes used, aisle widths, any slope/gradient assumptions).
Inputs Provided
Aerial image with boundary and footprint marked.
Site report (pre-purchase due diligence) with slope, services, and retaining notes.
Reference photos.
Two known scale dimensions.
Budget & Timeline
Trial task (1 hr): Place 4–6 stalls + aisle + one retaining line on base plan → 2000 INR.
Full V1 schematic (2 options + 1 revision): 12,000 INR (fixed price) - broken into four milestones.
Milestones & Payment Structure
Milestone 1 – Trial Task (10–20%)
Place 4–6 stalls + two-way aisle + one retaining line on base plan (to scale).
Deliver DWG + PDF with dimensions + layers.
Release: Correct scale, stalls 2.5×5.0 m, aisle ~6.0 m, retaining line labelled.
Milestone 2 – Draft Layouts (50%)
Provide 2 complete schematic options: parking, aisles, circulation arrows, retaining walls (with indicative heights), pedestrian paths, notes.
Release: Both options submitted in DWG + layered PDF, dimensioned + annotated.
Milestone 3 – Revisions & Final (30–40%)
Apply feedback → final chosen option revised and cleaned.
Deliver final DWG + layered PDF + 1-page assumptions/notes.
Release: Revisions accurate, files clean/editable, deliverables match spec.
Delivery within 5 days.
Mandatory Questions (Answer in Proposal)
Proposals without clear answers will not be considered.
What stall size and aisle width will you use for 90° two-way parking?
How will you indicate retaining walls and cut/fill areas in your drawing?
What is the maximum cut depth you’ll assume before needing a higher-spec retaining wall?
Please provide any samples of past work on constrained or sloped sites (top-down, dimensioned).
What software will you use to deliver DWG + PDF with layers?
We require a schematic feasibility layout (V1) for a steep site on a 809 sqm plot in Auckland.
The existing house will be converted into 6–7 therapy units, each with a separate entrance. The building footprint is fixed — your task is outside only: parking, circulation, access, and retaining feasibility.
This is a functional schematic only, not a polished render. We want a to-scale plan that tests how parking and circulation can realistically fit on a sloped lot.
Scope of Work
Create a to-scale, top-down schematic (DWG + PDF) showing:
Parking bays: NZ standard 2.5 m × 5.0 m (90° two-way default, but show if angled improves feasibility). Include 1 accessible bay near main entry.
Circulation: vehicle aisles, entry/exit from street, turning movements.
Pedestrian paths: safe, unobstructed routes from parking to unit entrances.
Slope / cut-fill: mark indicative retaining walls and approximate heights (bands: <1 m, 1–2 m, >2 m).
Services constraint: leave a corridor over the existing wastewater pipe (parking over pipe is acceptable; no building load).
Deliver two layout options with different parking arrangements.
Deliverables
Option A + Option B schematic: DWG + layered PDF at 1:200 or 1:250 scale.
Layers clearly separated: Boundary, Building, Parking, Aisles/Paths, Retaining, Pedestrian.
Dimensions on stalls and aisles.
Arrows for vehicle circulation.
Short notes/assumptions (stall sizes used, aisle widths, any slope/gradient assumptions).
Inputs Provided
Aerial image with boundary and footprint marked.
Site report (pre-purchase due diligence) with slope, services, and retaining notes.
Reference photos.
Two known scale dimensions.
Budget & Timeline
Trial task (1 hr): Place 4–6 stalls + aisle + one retaining line on base plan → 2000 INR.
Full V1 schematic (2 options + 1 revision): 12,000 INR (fixed price) - broken into four milestones.
Milestones & Payment Structure
Milestone 1 – Trial Task (10–20%)
Place 4–6 stalls + two-way aisle + one retaining line on base plan (to scale).
Deliver DWG + PDF with dimensions + layers.
Release: Correct scale, stalls 2.5×5.0 m, aisle ~6.0 m, retaining line labelled.
Milestone 2 – Draft Layouts (50%)
Provide 2 complete schematic options: parking, aisles, circulation arrows, retaining walls (with indicative heights), pedestrian paths, notes.
Release: Both options submitted in DWG + layered PDF, dimensioned + annotated.
Milestone 3 – Revisions & Final (30–40%)
Apply feedback → final chosen option revised and cleaned.
Deliver final DWG + layered PDF + 1-page assumptions/notes.
Release: Revisions accurate, files clean/editable, deliverables match spec.
Delivery within 5 days.
Mandatory Questions (Answer in Proposal)
Proposals without clear answers will not be considered.
What stall size and aisle width will you use for 90° two-way parking?
How will you indicate retaining walls and cut/fill areas in your drawing?
What is the maximum cut depth you’ll assume before needing a higher-spec retaining wall?
Please provide any samples of past work on constrained or sloped sites (top-down, dimensioned).
What software will you use to deliver DWG + PDF with layers?